3
$\begingroup$

Let $f\colon X \rightarrow Y$ be a proper morphism with $Y$ Noetherian (and even affine, if you wish), and let $\mathscr{A} = \bigoplus_{n \ge 0} \mathscr{A}_n$ be a quasi-coherent graded $\mathscr{O}_X$-algebra of finite type. Is the quasi-coherent graded $\mathscr{O}_Y$-algebra $f_* \mathscr{A}$ of finite type?

An analogue of this for graded modules is EGA III, 3.3.1. Perhaps the version for algebras that I am asking about can somehow be deduced, but I could't see how. I'd be happy to accept any precise reference (as well as any proof or counterexample, of course) as an answer.

$\endgroup$
0

2 Answers 2

9
$\begingroup$

No, that is not true, and there are several similar (and standard) examples. For one, let $Y$ be $\text{Spec}(k)$, let $X$ be an elliptic curve over $k$ (there are many other varieties one could use), let $f$ be the unique $k$-morphism, let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible sheaf on $X$ that is algebraically equivalent to $0$ but not torsion, and let $\mathcal{M}$ be an invertible sheaf of positive degree. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be $\mathcal{L}\oplus \mathcal{M}$, and let $\mathcal{A}$ be the symmetric algebra, $\text{Sym}^{\bullet}_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\mathcal{E})$. Thus, we have a direct sum decomposition, $$ \mathcal{A}_n = \text{Sym}^n_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\mathcal{L}\oplus \mathcal{M}) = \bigoplus_{l,m\geq 0, \ l+m=n} \left(\mathcal{L}^{\otimes l}\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{M}^{\otimes m}\right). $$ As is evident from this decomposition, $\mathcal{A}$ is actually $\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0} \times \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}$-graded; the decomposition is, $$ \mathcal{A} = \bigoplus_{l,m\geq 0} \mathcal{A}_{l,m}, \ \ \mathcal{A}_{l,m} = \mathcal{L}^{\otimes l}\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{M}^{\otimes m}. $$ Since cohomology commutes with direct sum of coherent sheaves on a Noetherian scheme, we have a $\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}\times \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}$-grading of the corresponding algebra of global sections, $$ H^0(X,\mathcal{A}) = \bigoplus_{l,m\geq 0} H^0(X,\mathcal{A}_{l,m}), \ \ H^0(X,\mathcal{A}_{l,m}) = H^0(X,\mathcal{L}^{\otimes l}\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{M}^{\otimes m}). $$ Using Riemann-Roch and the hypotheses on $\mathcal{L}$ and $\mathcal{M}$, the graded piece $H^0(X,\mathcal{A}_{l,m})$ is nonzero if and only if either $(l,m) = (0,0)$ or $m>0$. In particular, this gives a subsemigroup of $\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0} \times \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}$ that is not finitely generated as a subsemigroup. Therefore $H^0(X,\mathcal{A})$ cannot be finitely generated as a graded $k$-algebra.

Edit. Probably this example has appeared previously on MathOverflow -- it is a standard example. There are other examples with various other interesting features.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much, it's a very nice example! I wonder if you'd have any comments on the following variant: in the special case when $Y$ is affine and $\mathscr{A} = \bigoplus_{n \ge 0} \mathscr{L}^{\otimes n}$ for some line bundle $\mathscr{L}$ on $X$ with $\mathscr{L}^{\otimes n}$ generated by global sections for some $n > 0$, does my question admit a positive answer? I am trying to understand the beginning of the proof of 6.7/2 in "Neron models"; the proof opens with a couple of citations that don't justify the claims, as far as I can tell. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 13, 2014 at 23:17
4
$\begingroup$

What you're overlooking for the motivating situation (which should have been mentioned in the question as posed so that readers would have more context) is the final part of EGA III$_1$ 3.3.1. (Note that $Y'$ and $g$ there play no role whatsoever, by the way.)

In the setup of that result, set $\mathscr{S}$ to be the symmetric algebra over $\mathscr{O}_Y$ for the coherent sheaf $f_{\ast}(\mathscr{L}^{\otimes d})$ for an integer $d > 0$ (to be determined); this is graded quasi-coherent algebra of finite type on $Y$, generated in degree 1. Take $\mathscr{M}$ there to be $\mathscr{A} := \oplus_{n \ge 0} \mathscr{L}^{\otimes n}$ and set $p=0$. Observe that $\mathscr{M}$ is naturally a graded module over $f^{\ast}(\mathscr{S})$ by defining $\mathscr{M}_n = \oplus_{nd \le j < (n+1)d} \mathscr{L}^{\otimes j}$.

Hence, by (3.3.1.1) in loc. cit. if $\mathscr{M}$ is of finite type as an $f^{\ast}(\mathscr{S})$-module then there is an integer $k_0 > 0$ so that for $k\ge k_0$ we have $$\oplus_{(k+r)d \le j < (k+r+1)d} f_{\ast}(\mathscr{L}^{\otimes j})= \mathscr{S}_r \cdot \oplus_{kd \le j < (k+1)d} f_{\ast}(\mathscr{L}^{\otimes j})$$ for all $r \ge 0$. This means the natural multiplication map ${\rm{Sym}}^r(f_{\ast}(\mathscr{L}^{\otimes d})) \otimes f_{\ast}(\mathscr{L}^{\otimes j}) \rightarrow f_{\ast}(\mathscr{L}^{\otimes(rd+j)})$ is surjective for all $r \ge 0$ and all $j \ge k_0d$. It would then follow that the quasi-coherent $\mathscr{O}_Y$-algebra $f_{\ast}(\mathscr{A}) = \oplus_{n \ge 0} f_{\ast}(\mathscr{L}^{\otimes n})$ is generated by its (coherent) terms in degrees $\le k_0d$ as an $\mathscr{O}_Y$-algebra, so it would be of finite type as an $\mathscr{O}_Y$-algebra.

Thus, one just has to find $d>0$ for which the finite type graded $\mathscr{O}_X$-algebra $\oplus_{n \ge 0} \mathscr{L}^{\otimes n}$ is finite type as a graded module over the symmetric algebra on $f^{\ast}(f_{\ast}(\mathscr{L}^{\otimes d}))$. For this purpose it is certainly enough that $\mathscr{L}^{\otimes d}$ is generated by $f_{\ast}(\mathscr{L}^{\otimes d})$. In other words, it suffices that the natural map $f^{\ast}(f_{\ast}(\mathscr{L}^{\otimes d})) \rightarrow \mathscr{L}^{\otimes d}$ is surjective for some $d > 0$. That in turn is exactly one of the hypotheses in the motivating situation (which is presently not given in the question as posed).

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much, this is very helpful! One minor nitpick: one should take $k_0 \ge 1$ instead of $\ge 0$ in order to make the later $\le k_0 d$ claim true literally. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 14, 2014 at 1:00
  • $\begingroup$ @QuestionMark: OK, fixed. $\endgroup$
    – user74230
    Commented Dec 14, 2014 at 5:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .