1
$\begingroup$

Is it true that $S(O(p) \times O(q))$ is the only proper subgroup of $SO(p,q)$ of full rank acting on the natural representation $\mathbb{R}^{p+q}$ of $SO(p,q)$ that stabilizes a $p$-dimensional positive subspace and a $q$-dimensional negative subspace, and no other proper non-zero subspace?. More particularly, letting $H := SO(p) \times SO(q)$, may I know if there are any proper subgroups $K$ of $H$ such that rank $H$ = rank $K$ and $K$ ``behaves" as $H$ does?.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ It was very ignorant of me. For a while I took $U(p/2) \times U(q/2)$ for $U(p/2,q/2)$. Thanks for the clarification. But does it behave exactly like $SO(p) \times SO(q)$?.Also, are there any other subgroups of $SO(p) \times SO(q)$ that behave like $SO(p) \times SO(q)$. $\endgroup$
    – Vanya
    Commented Nov 21, 2014 at 3:23

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I answer the second question.

First I classify the connected $\mathbb{R}$-subgroups of full (absolute) rank of the compact $\mathbb{R}$-group $SO(p,\mathbb{R})$ that are $\mathbb{R}$-irreducible in the standard representation in $\mathbb{R}^p$. The connected $\mathbb{R}$-subgroups of full rank of $SO(p,\mathbb{R})$ correspond to connected $\mathbb{C}$-subgroups of full rank of $SO(p,\mathbb{C})$, and correspond to Lie subalgebras of full rank in the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{so}(p,\mathbb{C})$. Maximal Lie subalgebras of full rank of simple complex Lie algebras were classified by Dynkin in 1952. For a modern reference see Onishchik and Vinberg (eds.), Lie Groups and Lie Algebras III, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 41, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994. See Tables 5 and 6 in this book.

Let us assume for simplicity that $p\ge 7$. Then it follows from Tables 5 and 6 that, up to conjugation, the only maximal subalgebras of full rank of $\mathfrak{so}(p,\mathbb{C})$ are of the form $\mathfrak{so}(k,\mathbb{C})\oplus\mathfrak{so}(p-k,\mathbb{C})$ and, when $p$ is even, $\mathfrak{gl}(p/2,\mathbb{C})$. The Lie subalgebra $\mathfrak{so}(k,\mathbb{C})\oplus\mathfrak{so}(p-k,\mathbb{C})$ corresponds to the compact subgroup $SO(k,\mathbb{R})\times SO(p-k,\mathbb{R})$, which is reducible. The Lie subalgebra $\mathfrak{gl}(p/2,\mathbb{C})$ corresponds to the compact subgroup $U(p/2)$, which is irreducible (over $\mathbb{R}$, though not over $\mathbb{C}$).

Now we know all the maximal connected $\mathbb{R}$-subgroups of full rank of $SO(p,\mathbb{R})$ that are $\mathbb{R}$-irreducible: we have only $U(p/2)$. What about non-maximal subgroups? They must be proper connected subgroups of full rank of $U(p/2)$. Any proper connected subgroup of full rank of $U(p/2)$ is contained in a maximal connected subgroup of full rank of $U(p/2)$. From Tables 5 and 6 we see that the only maximal connected subgroups of full rank of $U(p/2)$ are of the form $U(k)\times U(p/2-k)$. They are reducible over $\mathbb{R}$. Thus there are no non-maximal connected subgroups of full rank of $U(p/2)$ which are irreducible over $\mathbb{R}$.

Now if $H=H_1\times H_2$, where $H_1=SO(p,R)$ and $H_2=SO(q,\mathbb{R})$, and $K\subset H$ is a subgroup of full rank, then $K=K_1\times K_2$, where $K_1\subset H_1$ and $K_2\subset H_2$ are subgroups of full ranks. If $K$ acts irreducibly over $\mathbb{R}$ in $\mathbb{R}^p$ and $\mathbb{R}^q$, then $K_1$ acts irreducibly over $\mathbb{R}$ in $\mathbb{R}^p$ and $K_2$ acts irreducibly over $\mathbb{R}$ in $\mathbb{R}^q$.

We obtain that $K=K_1\times K_2$, where $K_1$ is either $SO(p,\mathbb{R})$ or $U(p/2)$, and $K_2$ is either $SO(q,\mathbb{R})$ or $U(q/2)$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ In the second paragraph, I think, the phrase "the Lie subalgebra ......compact subgroup $SO(p,\mathbb{R})×SO(q,\mathbb{R})$, which is reducible", may be with $SO(p,\mathbb{R}) \times SO(p-k,\mathbb{R})$. $\endgroup$
    – Vanya
    Commented Nov 21, 2014 at 23:06
  • $\begingroup$ @user49908: Corrected! $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 22, 2014 at 20:56

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .