5
$\begingroup$

I apologize for asking something that might well be found in a mathematical dictionary, but the similarity of the French word to an English one is frustrating my attempts to Google the answer (and the library is shut at time of typing). I suspect the answer should be obvious to those who, unlike me, know some basic Lie group/Lie algebra terminology.

Some context: I am reading an old paper of Dixmier from 1969, which has the following construction/definition. Let $\mathfrak g$ be a Lie algebra (characteristic zero, finite-dimensional), let $\mathfrak n$ be its largest nilpotent ideal -- the nilradical -- and put ${\mathfrak h}=[{\mathfrak g},{\mathfrak g}]+{\mathfrak n}$. Dixmier calls ${\mathfrak h}$ "le nilradicalisé de ${\mathfrak g}$".

Literal translation would surely be "the nilradicalised", but that sounds more like a mopey university indie band than a mathematical object. So what is the usual name for this object in English?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know the English term for the object, but let me assure you that "the nilradicalized" actually sounds better than "le nilradicalisé"! (Given the year 1969, this could very well be a joke.) $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 31, 2010 at 23:10
  • $\begingroup$ The thought of Dixmier making jokes somehow doesn't compute in my head -- but I only know (some of) his work, so perhaps I'm selling him short. $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jan 31, 2010 at 23:28

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

I suspect pretty strongly that this is idiosyncratic terminology; I've never seen that subalgebra used, and the term has no google hits other than this post.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for confirming my suspicion. The paper's real goal is to say something about the von Neumann algebra of a connected Lie group; but I wasn't sure if this preliminary construction was somehow standard. $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jan 31, 2010 at 23:55
  • $\begingroup$ I've asked my dept neighbour who is a "Lie algebras person" and he too has neither heard the term nor seen that subalgebra. So it looks like Ben's answer is as good as we'll get. $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Feb 3, 2010 at 3:49
  • $\begingroup$ Something I may have noticed at the time but forgotten: MathSciNet gives exactly one match for the term "nilradicalis&eaacute;", and it is in Kleppner's review of a Trans. AMS paper of Pukanszky ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=486313 (The definition is made in the paper on page 22, just before Lemma 7; but Pukanszky never uses the term nilradicalisé) $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jan 5, 2013 at 0:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .