1
$\begingroup$

I came across the following while doing some related proof; It seems easy to prove. $\quad$
We are in ${\mathbb{M}}_n(\mathbb{C})$, $n>1$:

$1$) Given a unitary $n\times n$ matrix $U$, there is some permutation of the columns such that the modulus of each entry on the diagonal of the resulting matrix is $\le \dfrac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$, $\quad$

And more difficult:

$2$) There are no $n\times n$ unitary matrices $U$ of diagonal $D$ with all entries satisfying $|d_{i,i}|>\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{n-1}}$ for all $i$, unless $U$ is a direct sum of unitaries $U_k$, (up to a permutation congruence) $U_k\in {\mathbb{M}}_k$, $k<n$. I am searching for a proof or related facts.
Thanks.

Edit: for $2$ and $n=4$, we can take $\begin{pmatrix}a&b&c&d\\-b&a&-d&c\\-c&d&a&-b\\-d&-c&b&a\end{pmatrix}$. The only thing is that it may(not) hold for $n=3$.

$\endgroup$
12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How does 1 fit with the identity matrix being unitary? $\endgroup$
    – kneidell
    Commented Nov 17, 2019 at 11:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Actually, same goes for 2, unless I'm completely misunderstanding your question... $\endgroup$
    – kneidell
    Commented Nov 17, 2019 at 11:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There no problem for (1) with identity matrix. But I don't see how to interpret (2) "up to permutation". Please clarify. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Nov 17, 2019 at 12:28
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ (2) is false even with the correction. Just perturb the identity matrix slightly. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2019 at 14:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Consider $\begin{pmatrix}\frac{\cos(\theta)}{\sqrt{2}}&\frac{\sin(\theta)}{\sqrt{2}}&-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\\ \sin(\theta)&\cos(\theta)&0\\ \frac{\cos(\theta)}{\sqrt{2}}&\frac{\sin(\theta)}{\sqrt{2}}&\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\end{pmatrix}$ for small $\theta > 0$... $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2019 at 21:23

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Consider a unitary matrix $U = (u_{i,j})$. We will show that there is some permutation $\pi:[n] \to [n]$ such that $|u_{i,\pi(i)}| \leq \sqrt{2}/\sqrt{n+1}$ for all $i$, which is sufficient to prove the first stated conjecture when $n \geq 3$, and when $n=2$ we can use the expression of $U$ as: $$\left(\begin{array}{cc} \sin(\theta) & \cos(\theta)\\ \cos(\theta) & -\sin(\theta) \end{array}\right)$$ to obtain the desired bound, since $\min(\sin(\theta),\cos(\theta)) \leq \sqrt{2}/2$ for any $\theta$. Note that the process of permuting columns doesn't preserve the trace of the matrix, but it does preserve the property of being unitary!

Given $\pi$, consider the associated quantity $I(\pi) = \sum_{i=1}^n |u_{i,\pi(i)}|^2$. Since there are only finitely many permutations, there is some permutation $\pi_*$ minimizing this value. In particular, letting $v_{i,j} = u_{i,\pi_*(j)}$, the resulting matrix $V= (v_{i,j})$ after applying the permutation of the columns must satisfy $$|v_{i,j}|^2 + |v_{j,i}|^2 \geq |v_{i,i}|^2 + |v_{j,j}|^2$$ for all indices $i,j$, since otherwise we could exchange rows $i$ and $j$ and obtain a smaller value of $I(\pi)$.

Consider summing the above inequality over $j$. On the left hand side we get the squared norm of a row and a column of $V$, which both must be $1$. Thus we get: $$2 \geq n|v_{i,i}|^2 + I(\pi_*).$$ Since $I(\pi_*) \geq |v_{i,i}|^2$, this gives the claimed bound.

Summing the latter inequality over $i$, we moreover deduce that: $$2n \geq 2nI(\pi_*),$$ whence we conclude that $I(\pi_*) \leq 1$. Thus in particular, we cannot have $|v_{i,i}| > 1/\sqrt{n}$ for every $i$, which resolves one possible interpretation of the second part of the OP's question.

It is worth noting that it might be possible to strengthen these bounds for large enough $n$ by considering a more interesting permutation than a transposition in the original inequality, but it is tight for $n=2$ by the above and for $n=3$ since there is no way to avoid having a $\sqrt{2}/2$ on the diagonal of a matrix whose columns are a permutation of: $$\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & \sqrt{2}/2 & \sqrt{2}/2\\ 0 & \sqrt{2}/2 & -\sqrt{2}/2\\ 1 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right)$$

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I like this answer a lot. However, your conclusion $n |v_{i,i}|^2\le1$ would only be justified if you had $I(\pi_*)\ge1$, whereas you actually have $I(\pi_*)\le1$. Anyhow, you have proved a slightly weaker conclusion, $n |v_{i,i}|^2\le2$, which will imply the OP's conjecture 1) for $n\ge4$; the cases $n=2,3$ should be easy. Also, your proof applies to the more general setting with a general doubly stochastic matrix $(p_{ij})$ in place of the unistochastic matrix $(|u_{ij}|^2)$; see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unistochastic_matrix . $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2019 at 17:16
  • $\begingroup$ Oops yep, good point. I'll edit appropriately. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2019 at 17:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The feel of this proof reminded me of the Gershgorin Theorems bounding the spectrum of a matrix in terms of sums of column entries compared with diagonal entries. It's not directly relevant, but may be of interest. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2019 at 18:05
  • $\begingroup$ Concerning conjecture 2), Sam Zbarsky's comment shows it is false. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2019 at 19:06
  • $\begingroup$ @‍SamZbarsky's comment referenced by @IosifPinelis. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Nov 18, 2019 at 16:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .