7
$\begingroup$

Let $S(m,n)$ be the generalized symmetric group which is a wreath product of the cyclic group of order $m$, denoted here by $\mathbb{Z}_m$, and the symmetric group $S_n$. A standard unitary representation of $S(m,n)$ is given by the semi-direct product of the $n\times n$ permutation matrices and $n \times n$ diagonal matrices with $m$-th roots of unity entries. (These matrices are sometimes called generalized permutation matrices.)

For finite $m$ and $n$ all such unitary matrices form a finite subgroup of $U(n)$ of size $n! m^n$. I'll denote this group of unitary matrices as $M(m,n)$. One way to see that $M(m,n)$ is not a maximal finite subgroup of $U(n)$ is to note that $S(2m,n)$ is a finite group which has $S(m,n)$ as a subgroup. I'm interested in a slightly different question.

Let $U'\in U(n)$ be a unitary matrix which is not in $M(m,n)$ for any $m$ (in other words, $U'$ is not a generalized permutation matrix). Is the group generated by $M(m,n)$ (for some fixed $m$) and $U'$ always infinite?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ The question is equivalent to the question for $m=1$: is it true that for $U'$ unitary and not monomial, $\langle U',S_n\rangle$ is infinite? $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    May 20, 2022 at 12:17
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. That is equivalent to the question I intended to ask. If it is finite for $m=1$, I'm interested in when/if it becomes infinite for larger $m$. $\endgroup$ May 20, 2022 at 13:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Let $H_2 = 2^{-1/2} \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & -1 \end{pmatrix}$, then the group generated with $S_{2}$ is finite, as is the group generated by $H_4 = H_2 \otimes H_2$ with $S_{4}$, I think. Computing minimal polynomials of a few random products $H_{16}PH_{16}$ shows that many of these matrices have infinite order, though. $\endgroup$ May 20, 2022 at 14:56
  • $\begingroup$ @PadraigÓCatháin Excellent point! The matrix groups $M(1, 2), M(2, 2)$, and $M(4,2)$ are all subgroups of the 1-qubit Clifford group (which is isomorphic to the octahedral group). The Clifford group is a maximal finite subgroup of $U(2)$ which contains $H_2$. See arxiv.org/abs/math/0001038 for more details. $\endgroup$ May 21, 2022 at 3:34
  • $\begingroup$ @PadraigÓCatháin Thanks again! $M(1,4)$ and $M(2,4)$ are subgroups of the 2-qubit Clifford group which is a maximal finite subgroup of $U(4)$. This Clifford group contains $H_2 \otimes H_2$ (and $H_2 \otimes I_2$ and $I_2 \otimes H_2$ for that matter). I'm especially interested in whether the above conjecture is true for $M(1, 8)$, a purely permutation group. $\endgroup$ May 21, 2022 at 3:42

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

I think the answer is "yes" when $m >6$. By arguments along the lines of Frobenius, Schur and Blichfeldt, if we set $G = \langle M(m,n), U^{\prime} \rangle $ and assume that $G$ is finite, then the non-scalar elements of $G$ whose eigenvalues all lies on an arc of length less than $\frac{\pi}{3}$ on the unit circle generate an Abelian normal subgroup of $G$, say $A$. When $m >6$, this Abelian group has rank $n$, and may be assumed to consist of diagonal matrices. In that case, $C_{G}(A)$ also consists of diagonal matrices (using that $A$ has rank $n$). By Clifford's theorem, we may conclude that the given representation of $A$ is now induced from a $1$-dimensional representation of a subgroup of $G$ of index $n$. In other words, $G$ now consists of monomial matrices.

I suppose, to be more precise, this argument shows that if $m > 6$, any finite unitary overgroup of $M(m,n)$ is conjugate (via a unitary matrix) to a finite group of monomial matrices ( what you call "generalized permutation matrices" are what I am calling monomial matrices).

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Can you give me some more details and perhaps a link? This is exactly the type of answer I was looking for, I just don't fully understand it yet. $\endgroup$ May 21, 2022 at 3:45
  • $\begingroup$ The 1962 book of Curtis and Reiner has a section "On theorems of Frobenius, Schur and Burnside" (or something like that), and al the Character Theory book by Isaacs. The upshot is that in a finite subgroup of $U(n,\mathbb{C})$, any two elements which have all their eigenvalues close enough together on the unit circle commute. $\endgroup$ May 21, 2022 at 10:18
  • $\begingroup$ When $m >6$, $M(m,n)$ has a natural diagonal subgroup $T$ of order $m^{n}$ , generated by $n$ elements of order $m$, each with $m-1$ eigenvalues $1$. Hence the group $A$ in the answer contains $T$, and necessarily needs $n$ generators. Then the continuation as in the answer should be clear. $\endgroup$ May 21, 2022 at 10:22
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, that makes sense. For clairification this argument works for all $n$, correct? $\endgroup$ May 21, 2022 at 12:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, it works for all n. $\endgroup$ May 21, 2022 at 15:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.