2
$\begingroup$

Assume that $X$ is a non-vanishing vector field on $\mathbb{R}^3$.

Is there a $2$-dimensional foliation of space such that every trajectory of $X$ is contained in a leaf of the $2$-dimensional foliation?

As a related question:

Is there a classification of all $1$-dimensional foliations of space tangent to the unit speed vector field $t$ for which the distributions $\{t,n\}$ and $\{t,b\}$ are integrable? Here $\{t,n,b\}$ is the associated Frenet frame.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
+50
$\begingroup$

No. For a counterexample, start with the Hopf map $S^3\to S^2$, a fiber bundle with $S^1$ fibers. Its fibers are the leaves of a $1$-dimensional foliation of $S^3$ in which all leaves are closed and the space of leaves is $S^2$. Choose a vector field tangent to the leaves. Remove one point from $S^3$ to get $\mathbb R^3$. A $2$-dimensional foliation of the kind asked for would give a $1$-dimensional foliation of $S^2$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for this interesting answer. I understand the tangent vector field to the Hopf foliation is not contained in any 2 dimensional smooth distribution $D$ otherwise since any such distribution would be map to a $1$ dimensional foliation of $S^2$.Am I correct? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2017 at 11:16
  • $\begingroup$ So a natural question is that "Is the Reeb foliation transverse to the hopf fibration, at all points?* $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2017 at 11:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, that was my reasoning. No, the Reeb foliation has a torus leaf, but no torus in $S^3$ can be transverse to the Hopf fibration because that would make it a covering space of $S^2$. In fact, no $2$-dimensional foliation of $S^3$ that has a compact leaf can be transverse to the Hopf fibration. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2017 at 18:28
  • $\begingroup$ My apology if my question is elementary. How the foliation on total space, which is not necessarily $S^1$ invariant, give us a foliation of the bases space? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 4, 2019 at 21:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, that's a simpler way to explain it. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12, 2019 at 15:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .