Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Corrected typo in title
Link
Nate River
  • 6.2k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 99

How to estimate an integral by the variation and upper buondbound of the integrand?

added 76 characters in body
Source Link
Watheophy
  • 419
  • 2
  • 6

Suppose that $f$ is a continuous function on $\mathbb{R}$. I want to estimate the definite integral $$ I:= \int_{0}^a [f(x)-f(0)]dx $$ by the upper bound $M = \sup_{x\in[0,a]}|f(x)|$ and the variation $V_f(x,\delta):=\sup_{y\in [x,x+\delta]}|f(x)-f(y)|$

I have a small $\delta>0$ and eventually make $\delta \rightarrow 0$. And fix a positive constant integer $k$. Then the part $$I_1:=\int_0^{k\delta} [f(x)-f(0)]dx$$ can be precisely estimated by $$ |I_1|\leq\delta \sum_{j=0}^{k-1} V_f(j\delta,\delta)$$$$ |I_1|\leq \sum_{i=0}^{k-1}\int_{i\delta}^{(i+1)\delta} |f(x)-f(0)| \leq \delta \sum_{i=0}^{k}\sum_{j=0}^{i} V_f(j\delta,\delta)$$ due to the continuity of $f$. Although we can also estimate it by upper bound $|I_1|\leq 2M \delta$, it is clearly not the best choice.

However, if I have a constant $0<c<a$ and don't do anything to it later, then the variation is not the best choice for the part $$ I_2 := \int_{c}^a [f(x)-f(0)]dx$$ because $x$ is far away from $0$. So, it may be the best choice to estimate by the upper bound. $$ I_2 \leq 2(a-c)M. $$

The question is what is the best estimation for the rest interval $$ I_3 := \int_{k\delta}^{c}[f(x)-f(0)] ?$$ It seems either the variation or the upper bound is not the best choice. That is, they both overestimate $|I_3|$. Of course, if $f$ satisfies some Holder continuity, $|I_3|$ can be estimated well. Here, nevertheless, I wonder what estimation we can do for the most general continuous functions.

Suppose that $f$ is a continuous function on $\mathbb{R}$. I want to estimate the definite integral $$ I:= \int_{0}^a [f(x)-f(0)]dx $$ by the upper bound $M = \sup_{x\in[0,a]}|f(x)|$ and the variation $V_f(x,\delta):=\sup_{y\in [x,x+\delta]}|f(x)-f(y)|$

I have a small $\delta>0$ and eventually make $\delta \rightarrow 0$. And fix a positive constant integer $k$. Then the part $$I_1:=\int_0^{k\delta} [f(x)-f(0)]dx$$ can be precisely estimated by $$ |I_1|\leq\delta \sum_{j=0}^{k-1} V_f(j\delta,\delta)$$ due to the continuity of $f$. Although we can also estimate it by upper bound $|I_1|\leq 2M \delta$, it is clearly not the best choice.

However, if I have a constant $0<c<a$ and don't do anything to it later, then the variation is not the best choice for the part $$ I_2 := \int_{c}^a [f(x)-f(0)]dx$$ because $x$ is far away from $0$. So, it may be the best choice to estimate by the upper bound. $$ I_2 \leq 2(a-c)M. $$

The question is what is the best estimation for the rest interval $$ I_3 := \int_{k\delta}^{c}[f(x)-f(0)] ?$$ It seems either the variation or the upper bound is not the best choice. That is, they both overestimate $|I_3|$. Of course, if $f$ satisfies some Holder continuity, $|I_3|$ can be estimated well. Here, nevertheless, I wonder what estimation we can do for the most general continuous functions.

Suppose that $f$ is a continuous function on $\mathbb{R}$. I want to estimate the definite integral $$ I:= \int_{0}^a [f(x)-f(0)]dx $$ by the upper bound $M = \sup_{x\in[0,a]}|f(x)|$ and the variation $V_f(x,\delta):=\sup_{y\in [x,x+\delta]}|f(x)-f(y)|$

I have a small $\delta>0$ and eventually make $\delta \rightarrow 0$. And fix a positive constant integer $k$. Then the part $$I_1:=\int_0^{k\delta} [f(x)-f(0)]dx$$ can be precisely estimated by $$ |I_1|\leq \sum_{i=0}^{k-1}\int_{i\delta}^{(i+1)\delta} |f(x)-f(0)| \leq \delta \sum_{i=0}^{k}\sum_{j=0}^{i} V_f(j\delta,\delta)$$ due to the continuity of $f$. Although we can also estimate it by upper bound $|I_1|\leq 2M \delta$, it is clearly not the best choice.

However, if I have a constant $0<c<a$ and don't do anything to it later, then the variation is not the best choice for the part $$ I_2 := \int_{c}^a [f(x)-f(0)]dx$$ because $x$ is far away from $0$. So, it may be the best choice to estimate by the upper bound. $$ I_2 \leq 2(a-c)M. $$

The question is what is the best estimation for the rest interval $$ I_3 := \int_{k\delta}^{c}[f(x)-f(0)] ?$$ It seems either the variation or the upper bound is not the best choice. That is, they both overestimate $|I_3|$. Of course, if $f$ satisfies some Holder continuity, $|I_3|$ can be estimated well. Here, nevertheless, I wonder what estimation we can do for the most general continuous functions.

Source Link
Watheophy
  • 419
  • 2
  • 6

How to estimate an integral by the variation and upper buond of the integrand?

Suppose that $f$ is a continuous function on $\mathbb{R}$. I want to estimate the definite integral $$ I:= \int_{0}^a [f(x)-f(0)]dx $$ by the upper bound $M = \sup_{x\in[0,a]}|f(x)|$ and the variation $V_f(x,\delta):=\sup_{y\in [x,x+\delta]}|f(x)-f(y)|$

I have a small $\delta>0$ and eventually make $\delta \rightarrow 0$. And fix a positive constant integer $k$. Then the part $$I_1:=\int_0^{k\delta} [f(x)-f(0)]dx$$ can be precisely estimated by $$ |I_1|\leq\delta \sum_{j=0}^{k-1} V_f(j\delta,\delta)$$ due to the continuity of $f$. Although we can also estimate it by upper bound $|I_1|\leq 2M \delta$, it is clearly not the best choice.

However, if I have a constant $0<c<a$ and don't do anything to it later, then the variation is not the best choice for the part $$ I_2 := \int_{c}^a [f(x)-f(0)]dx$$ because $x$ is far away from $0$. So, it may be the best choice to estimate by the upper bound. $$ I_2 \leq 2(a-c)M. $$

The question is what is the best estimation for the rest interval $$ I_3 := \int_{k\delta}^{c}[f(x)-f(0)] ?$$ It seems either the variation or the upper bound is not the best choice. That is, they both overestimate $|I_3|$. Of course, if $f$ satisfies some Holder continuity, $|I_3|$ can be estimated well. Here, nevertheless, I wonder what estimation we can do for the most general continuous functions.