Skip to main content
fixed the regularity assumptions in accordance to the comments
Source Link

(This question is a duplicate from here)

We start with the linear elliptic PDE

$$ -\operatorname{div}(A\nabla u)=f \quad\text{in}\ \Omega,\\ u=0 \quad\text{on}\ \partial\Omega $$ We assume that $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth domain, that $A\colon\Omega\to\mathbb{R}^3$$A\in C^\alpha(\overline{\Omega})$ (for some $\alpha>0$) is bounded anda symmetric, positive definite matrix-valued function (there is $c_A>0$ such that $A\xi\cdot\xi>c_\alpha|\xi|^2$$A(x)\xi\cdot\xi>c_\alpha|\xi|^2$ for all $\xi\in\mathbb{R}^3$ and all $x\in\Omega$), and a function $f\in L^s(\Omega)$ for some $s>2$$f\in L^\infty(\Omega)$.

For some $\delta>0$ and some continuoussymmetric $B\colon\overline{\Omega}\to\mathbb{R}^3$$B\in C^\alpha(\overline{\Omega})$, we also look at the perturbed problem

$$ -\operatorname{div}((A+\delta B)\nabla v)=f \quad\text{in}\ \Omega,\\ v=0 \quad\text{on}\ \partial\Omega. $$

My question: If I know, that I have bounds on the gradient of $u$, like

$$ \|\nabla u\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}\leq C(C_P,|\Omega|,c_\alpha,\|f\|_{L^s(\Omega)}), $$$$ \|\nabla u\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}\leq C(C_P,|\Omega|,c_\alpha,\|f\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}), $$

can I conclude something similar for $v$ (for sufficiently small $\delta$), like

$$ \|\nabla v\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}\leq C(C_P,|\Omega|,c_\alpha,\|f\|_{L^s(\Omega)},\delta, \|B\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)})? $$$$ \|\nabla v\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}\leq C(C_P,|\Omega|,c_\alpha,\|f\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)},\delta, \|B\|_{C^\alpha(\overline{\Omega})})? $$ In these estimates, $C_P$ denotes the Poincare inequality constant.

I tried to prove this estimate via difference quotients and cut-offs but somehow got stuck. If it holds, what technique would you use to prove this? And if it is not possible, why could this estimate fail?

(This question is a duplicate from here)

We start with the linear elliptic PDE

$$ -\operatorname{div}(A\nabla u)=f \quad\text{in}\ \Omega,\\ u=0 \quad\text{on}\ \partial\Omega $$ We assume that $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth domain, $A\colon\Omega\to\mathbb{R}^3$ is bounded and positive definite matrix-valued function (there is $c_A>0$ such that $A\xi\cdot\xi>c_\alpha|\xi|^2$ for all $\xi\in\mathbb{R}^3$), and a function $f\in L^s(\Omega)$ for some $s>2$.

For some $\delta>0$ and some continuous $B\colon\overline{\Omega}\to\mathbb{R}^3$, we also look at the perturbed problem

$$ -\operatorname{div}((A+\delta B)\nabla v)=f \quad\text{in}\ \Omega,\\ v=0 \quad\text{on}\ \partial\Omega. $$

My question: If I know, that I have bounds on the gradient of $u$, like

$$ \|\nabla u\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}\leq C(C_P,|\Omega|,c_\alpha,\|f\|_{L^s(\Omega)}), $$

can I conclude something similar for $v$ (for sufficiently small $\delta$), like

$$ \|\nabla v\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}\leq C(C_P,|\Omega|,c_\alpha,\|f\|_{L^s(\Omega)},\delta, \|B\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)})? $$ In these estimates, $C_P$ denotes the Poincare inequality constant.

I tried to prove this estimate via difference quotients and cut-offs but somehow got stuck. If it holds, what technique would you use to prove this? And if it is not possible, why could this estimate fail?

(This question is a duplicate from here)

We start with the linear elliptic PDE

$$ -\operatorname{div}(A\nabla u)=f \quad\text{in}\ \Omega,\\ u=0 \quad\text{on}\ \partial\Omega $$ We assume that $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth domain, that $A\in C^\alpha(\overline{\Omega})$ (for some $\alpha>0$) is a symmetric, positive definite matrix-valued function (there is $c_A>0$ such that $A(x)\xi\cdot\xi>c_\alpha|\xi|^2$ for all $\xi\in\mathbb{R}^3$ and all $x\in\Omega$), and a function $f\in L^\infty(\Omega)$.

For some $\delta>0$ and some symmetric $B\in C^\alpha(\overline{\Omega})$, we also look at the perturbed problem

$$ -\operatorname{div}((A+\delta B)\nabla v)=f \quad\text{in}\ \Omega,\\ v=0 \quad\text{on}\ \partial\Omega. $$

My question: If I know, that I have bounds on the gradient of $u$, like

$$ \|\nabla u\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}\leq C(C_P,|\Omega|,c_\alpha,\|f\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}), $$

can I conclude something similar for $v$ (for sufficiently small $\delta$), like

$$ \|\nabla v\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}\leq C(C_P,|\Omega|,c_\alpha,\|f\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)},\delta, \|B\|_{C^\alpha(\overline{\Omega})})? $$ In these estimates, $C_P$ denotes the Poincare inequality constant.

I tried to prove this estimate via difference quotients and cut-offs but somehow got stuck. If it holds, what technique would you use to prove this? And if it is not possible, why could this estimate fail?

formatting, added tag
Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Linear Elliptic Problemselliptic problems: Are gradient estimates preserved after perturbation?

Source Link

Linear Elliptic Problems: Are gradient estimates preserved after perturbation?

(This question is a duplicate from here)

We start with the linear elliptic PDE

$$ -\operatorname{div}(A\nabla u)=f \quad\text{in}\ \Omega,\\ u=0 \quad\text{on}\ \partial\Omega $$ We assume that $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth domain, $A\colon\Omega\to\mathbb{R}^3$ is bounded and positive definite matrix-valued function (there is $c_A>0$ such that $A\xi\cdot\xi>c_\alpha|\xi|^2$ for all $\xi\in\mathbb{R}^3$), and a function $f\in L^s(\Omega)$ for some $s>2$.

For some $\delta>0$ and some continuous $B\colon\overline{\Omega}\to\mathbb{R}^3$, we also look at the perturbed problem

$$ -\operatorname{div}((A+\delta B)\nabla v)=f \quad\text{in}\ \Omega,\\ v=0 \quad\text{on}\ \partial\Omega. $$

My question: If I know, that I have bounds on the gradient of $u$, like

$$ \|\nabla u\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}\leq C(C_P,|\Omega|,c_\alpha,\|f\|_{L^s(\Omega)}), $$

can I conclude something similar for $v$ (for sufficiently small $\delta$), like

$$ \|\nabla v\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}\leq C(C_P,|\Omega|,c_\alpha,\|f\|_{L^s(\Omega)},\delta, \|B\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)})? $$ In these estimates, $C_P$ denotes the Poincare inequality constant.

I tried to prove this estimate via difference quotients and cut-offs but somehow got stuck. If it holds, what technique would you use to prove this? And if it is not possible, why could this estimate fail?