Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Title of paper while this is on the front page
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

I will base my question on Fock and Goncharov's paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0510312)Dual Teichmüller and lamination spaces.

Let $S$ be a surface with boundaries, marked points on such boundaries, punctures and boundaries without marked points. We collectively call punctures and unmarked boundaries holes.

To $S$ we can associate two TeichmullerTeichmüller spaces, let me call them $T_A(S)$ and $T_X(S)$. The first is the Decorated Teichmullerdecorated Teichmüller space, where above each puncture and marked point is made a choice of ana horocycle. In this case all holes must be punctures. The second is the usual TeichmullerTeichmüller space, and we now allow un-marked boundaries.

We define a triangulation $T$ of $S$ to be a triangulation of the surface obtained by replacing each hole with a puncture.

Associated to a triangulation $T$ of $S$ there are coordinate systems for both $T_A(S)$ and $T_X(S)$. They are positive numbers associated to the edges $e$ of $T$ and to the non-boundary edges of $T$ respectively. They are given by $\lambda$-lengths for $T_A(S)$ (indicated by $\lambda_e$) and by shear coordinates for $T_X(S)$ (indicated by $x_e$).

There is a map $T_A(S) \to T_X(S)$, which I will call the shear map, which is given in coordinates by $x_e = \frac{\lambda_a \lambda_c}{\lambda_b \lambda_d}$, for each inner edge $e$ belonging to triangles $[e,a,b]$ and $[e,c,d]$ of $T$.

This map lands in the subspace $\prod_{e \in p} x_e = 1$, where the product is taken over all edges $e$ incident to a hole $p$. This is a subspace of $T_X(S)$ because in general this product gives the exponential of the hyperbolic length of the hole.

QUESTION

Is it possible to define a "natural" map $T_A(S) \to T_X(S)$ that doesn't land in this subspace? By "natural" I mean that it does not depend on any choice of triangulation.

I will base my question on Fock and Goncharov's paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0510312).

Let $S$ be a surface with boundaries, marked points on such boundaries, punctures and boundaries without marked points. We collectively call punctures and unmarked boundaries holes.

To $S$ we can associate two Teichmuller spaces, let me call them $T_A(S)$ and $T_X(S)$. The first is the Decorated Teichmuller space, where above each puncture and marked point is made a choice of an horocycle. In this case all holes must be punctures. The second is the usual Teichmuller space, and we now allow un-marked boundaries.

We define a triangulation $T$ of $S$ to be a triangulation of the surface obtained by replacing each hole with a puncture.

Associated to a triangulation $T$ of $S$ there are coordinate systems for both $T_A(S)$ and $T_X(S)$. They are positive numbers associated to the edges $e$ of $T$ and to the non-boundary edges of $T$ respectively. They are given by $\lambda$-lengths for $T_A(S)$ (indicated by $\lambda_e$) and by shear coordinates for $T_X(S)$ (indicated by $x_e$).

There is a map $T_A(S) \to T_X(S)$, which I will call the shear map, which is given in coordinates by $x_e = \frac{\lambda_a \lambda_c}{\lambda_b \lambda_d}$, for each inner edge $e$ belonging to triangles $[e,a,b]$ and $[e,c,d]$ of $T$.

This map lands in the subspace $\prod_{e \in p} x_e = 1$, where the product is taken over all edges $e$ incident to a hole $p$. This is a subspace of $T_X(S)$ because in general this product gives the exponential of the hyperbolic length of the hole.

QUESTION

Is it possible to define a "natural" map $T_A(S) \to T_X(S)$ that doesn't land in this subspace? By "natural" I mean that it does not depend on any choice of triangulation.

I will base my question on Fock and Goncharov's paper Dual Teichmüller and lamination spaces.

Let $S$ be a surface with boundaries, marked points on such boundaries, punctures and boundaries without marked points. We collectively call punctures and unmarked boundaries holes.

To $S$ we can associate two Teichmüller spaces, let me call them $T_A(S)$ and $T_X(S)$. The first is the decorated Teichmüller space, where above each puncture and marked point is made a choice of a horocycle. In this case all holes must be punctures. The second is the usual Teichmüller space, and we now allow un-marked boundaries.

We define a triangulation $T$ of $S$ to be a triangulation of the surface obtained by replacing each hole with a puncture.

Associated to a triangulation $T$ of $S$ there are coordinate systems for both $T_A(S)$ and $T_X(S)$. They are positive numbers associated to the edges $e$ of $T$ and to the non-boundary edges of $T$ respectively. They are given by $\lambda$-lengths for $T_A(S)$ (indicated by $\lambda_e$) and by shear coordinates for $T_X(S)$ (indicated by $x_e$).

There is a map $T_A(S) \to T_X(S)$, which I will call the shear map, which is given in coordinates by $x_e = \frac{\lambda_a \lambda_c}{\lambda_b \lambda_d}$, for each inner edge $e$ belonging to triangles $[e,a,b]$ and $[e,c,d]$ of $T$.

This map lands in the subspace $\prod_{e \in p} x_e = 1$, where the product is taken over all edges $e$ incident to a hole $p$. This is a subspace of $T_X(S)$ because in general this product gives the exponential of the hyperbolic length of the hole.

QUESTION

Is it possible to define a "natural" map $T_A(S) \to T_X(S)$ that doesn't land in this subspace? By "natural" I mean that it does not depend on any choice of triangulation.

Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Post Undeleted by giulio bullsaver
Post Deleted by giulio bullsaver
Post Undeleted by giulio bullsaver
Post Deleted by giulio bullsaver
edited tags
Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286
Source Link

Cluster algebras of type A and X

I will base my question on Fock and Goncharov's paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0510312).

Let $S$ be a surface with boundaries, marked points on such boundaries, punctures and boundaries without marked points. We collectively call punctures and unmarked boundaries holes.

To $S$ we can associate two Teichmuller spaces, let me call them $T_A(S)$ and $T_X(S)$. The first is the Decorated Teichmuller space, where above each puncture and marked point is made a choice of an horocycle. In this case all holes must be punctures. The second is the usual Teichmuller space, and we now allow un-marked boundaries.

We define a triangulation $T$ of $S$ to be a triangulation of the surface obtained by replacing each hole with a puncture.

Associated to a triangulation $T$ of $S$ there are coordinate systems for both $T_A(S)$ and $T_X(S)$. They are positive numbers associated to the edges $e$ of $T$ and to the non-boundary edges of $T$ respectively. They are given by $\lambda$-lengths for $T_A(S)$ (indicated by $\lambda_e$) and by shear coordinates for $T_X(S)$ (indicated by $x_e$).

There is a map $T_A(S) \to T_X(S)$, which I will call the shear map, which is given in coordinates by $x_e = \frac{\lambda_a \lambda_c}{\lambda_b \lambda_d}$, for each inner edge $e$ belonging to triangles $[e,a,b]$ and $[e,c,d]$ of $T$.

This map lands in the subspace $\prod_{e \in p} x_e = 1$, where the product is taken over all edges $e$ incident to a hole $p$. This is a subspace of $T_X(S)$ because in general this product gives the exponential of the hyperbolic length of the hole.

QUESTION

Is it possible to define a "natural" map $T_A(S) \to T_X(S)$ that doesn't land in this subspace? By "natural" I mean that it does not depend on any choice of triangulation.