Skip to main content
Notice removed Canonical answer required by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Canonical answer required by Forbs
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Forbs
Minor Math Jaxing (formula hyperlinking + vector spaces in bold) + minor formatting and grammar improvement
Source Link

I am studying a about O'Neil's convolution inequality. It is stated that for Let $\Phi_1$ and $\Phi_2$ be $N$-functions, with $\Phi_i(2t)\approx \Phi_i(t), \quad i=1,2$ $$ \Phi_i(2t)\approx \Phi_i(t), \quad i=1,2 $$ with $t\gg 1$ and let $k \in M_+(R^n)$$k \in M_+(\mathbf R^n)$ is the kernel of a convolution operator.

The
Furthermore let $\rho$ isbe an r.i. norm on $M_+(R^n)$$M_+(\mathbf R^n)$ given in terms of the r.i norm $\bar \rho$ on $M_+(R_+)$$M_+(\mathbf R_+)$ by $$ \rho(f)=\bar \rho(f^*), \quad f \in M_+(R_+) $$

Denote$$ \rho(f)=\bar \rho(f^*), \quad f \in M_+(\mathbf R_+) $$ Denote Orlicz gauge norms, $\rho_{\Phi}$, for which $$ (\bar \rho_{\Phi})_d\approx \bar \rho_{\Phi}\left(\int_0^t h/t\right). $$

It It is stated that $$ \rho_{\Phi_1}(k+f)\leq C \rho_{\Phi_2}(f) $$ if $$ (i) \quad \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left(\frac 1t \int_0^t k^*(s)\int_0^sf^*\right)\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*) $$ $$ (ii) \quad \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left (\frac 1t\int_0^t f^*(s)\int_0^sk^*\right)\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*) $$ $$ (iii) \quad \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left(\int_t^{\infty}k^*f^*\right)\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*). $$$$ \begin{align} \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left(\frac 1t \int_0^t k^*(s)\int_0^sf^*\right) &\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*)\label{1}\tag{i}\\ \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left (\frac 1t\int_0^t f^*(s)\int_0^sk^*\right) &\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*)\label{2}\tag{ii}\\ \quad \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left(\int_t^{\infty}k^*f^*\right)& \leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*)\label{3}\tag{iii}. \end{align} $$

I cannot understand under which conditions on the kernel those inequalities (i)\eqref{1},(ii)\eqref{2} and (iii)\eqref{3} would hold.

I am studying a about O'Neil's convolution inequality. It is stated that for $\Phi_1$ and $\Phi_2$ be $N$-functions, with $\Phi_i(2t)\approx \Phi_i(t), \quad i=1,2$ with $t\gg 1$ and $k \in M_+(R^n)$ is the kernel of a convolution operator.

The $\rho$ is an r.i. norm on $M_+(R^n)$ given in terms of the r.i norm $\bar \rho$ on $M_+(R_+)$ by $$ \rho(f)=\bar \rho(f^*), \quad f \in M_+(R_+) $$

Denote Orlicz gauge norms, $\rho_{\Phi}$, for which $$ (\bar \rho_{\Phi})_d\approx \bar \rho_{\Phi}\left(\int_0^t h/t\right). $$

It is stated that $$ \rho_{\Phi_1}(k+f)\leq C \rho_{\Phi_2}(f) $$ if $$ (i) \quad \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left(\frac 1t \int_0^t k^*(s)\int_0^sf^*\right)\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*) $$ $$ (ii) \quad \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left (\frac 1t\int_0^t f^*(s)\int_0^sk^*\right)\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*) $$ $$ (iii) \quad \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left(\int_t^{\infty}k^*f^*\right)\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*). $$

I cannot understand under which conditions on kernel those inequalities (i),(ii) and (iii) would hold.

I am studying O'Neil's convolution inequality. Let $\Phi_1$ and $\Phi_2$ be $N$-functions, with $$ \Phi_i(2t)\approx \Phi_i(t), \quad i=1,2 $$ with $t\gg 1$ and let $k \in M_+(\mathbf R^n)$ is the kernel of a convolution operator.
Furthermore let $\rho$ be an r.i. norm on $M_+(\mathbf R^n)$ given in terms of the r.i norm $\bar \rho$ on $M_+(\mathbf R_+)$ by $$ \rho(f)=\bar \rho(f^*), \quad f \in M_+(\mathbf R_+) $$ Denote Orlicz gauge norms, $\rho_{\Phi}$, for which $$ (\bar \rho_{\Phi})_d\approx \bar \rho_{\Phi}\left(\int_0^t h/t\right). $$ It is stated that $$ \rho_{\Phi_1}(k+f)\leq C \rho_{\Phi_2}(f) $$ if $$ \begin{align} \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left(\frac 1t \int_0^t k^*(s)\int_0^sf^*\right) &\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*)\label{1}\tag{i}\\ \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left (\frac 1t\int_0^t f^*(s)\int_0^sk^*\right) &\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*)\label{2}\tag{ii}\\ \quad \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left(\int_t^{\infty}k^*f^*\right)& \leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*)\label{3}\tag{iii}. \end{align} $$

I cannot understand under which conditions on the kernel those inequalities \eqref{1},\eqref{2} and \eqref{3} would hold.

Source Link
Forbs
  • 101
  • 5

Condition on kernel convolution operator

I am studying a about O'Neil's convolution inequality. It is stated that for $\Phi_1$ and $\Phi_2$ be $N$-functions, with $\Phi_i(2t)\approx \Phi_i(t), \quad i=1,2$ with $t\gg 1$ and $k \in M_+(R^n)$ is the kernel of a convolution operator.

The $\rho$ is an r.i. norm on $M_+(R^n)$ given in terms of the r.i norm $\bar \rho$ on $M_+(R_+)$ by $$ \rho(f)=\bar \rho(f^*), \quad f \in M_+(R_+) $$

Denote Orlicz gauge norms, $\rho_{\Phi}$, for which $$ (\bar \rho_{\Phi})_d\approx \bar \rho_{\Phi}\left(\int_0^t h/t\right). $$

It is stated that $$ \rho_{\Phi_1}(k+f)\leq C \rho_{\Phi_2}(f) $$ if $$ (i) \quad \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left(\frac 1t \int_0^t k^*(s)\int_0^sf^*\right)\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*) $$ $$ (ii) \quad \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left (\frac 1t\int_0^t f^*(s)\int_0^sk^*\right)\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*) $$ $$ (iii) \quad \bar \rho_{\Phi_1}\left(\int_t^{\infty}k^*f^*\right)\leq C \bar \rho_{\Phi_2}(f^*). $$

I cannot understand under which conditions on kernel those inequalities (i),(ii) and (iii) would hold.