Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Draw attention by 0xbadf00d
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by 0xbadf00d
edited body
Source Link
0xbadf00d
  • 167
  • 1
  • 5
  • 16

I've got a contractive self-adjoint linear integral operator $\kappa$ of the form $$(\kappa g)(x):=g(x)+\int\lambda({\rm d}y)k(x,y)(g(y)-g(x))\;\;\;\text{for }g\in L^2(\mu),$$ where $k$ depends on the choice of a family of "weights" $(w_i)_{i\in I}$ (see definitions below). We may assume that the spectrum $\sigma(\kappa)$ is contained in $[-1,1)$.

I want to determine a choice of $(w_i)_{i\in I}$ minimizing $\langle(1-\kappa)^{-1}f_0,f_0\rangle_{L^2(\mu)}$, where $f_0:=f-\int f\:{\rm d}\mu$ and $f$ is defined below. How can we solve this problem?

Maybe it's useful to consider the spectral measure $E:\mathcal B(\mathbb R)\to\mathfrak L(H)$ associated with $\kappa$ and write $$(1-\kappa)^{-1}=\int_{[-1,\:1)}\frac1{1-\lambda}\:E({\rm d}\lambda)\tag1,$$ but it's not clear to me how $E$ depends on $(w_i)_{i\in I}$.

Definitions:

  • $I$ is a finite set;
  • $p,q_i$ are probability densities on a measure space $(E,\mathcal E,\lambda)$;
  • $f\in\mathcal L^2(\lambda)$ with $\{p=0\}\subseteq\{f=0\}$;
  • $w_i:E\to\mathbb R$ is $\mathcal E$-measurable with $\{q_i=0\}\subseteq\{w_ip=0\}$ for $i\in I$ with $\{pf\ne0\}\subseteq\left\{\sum_{i\in I}w_i=1\right\}$;
  • $\sigma_{ij}:E^2\to\mathbb R$ beis $\mathcal E^{\otimes2}$-measurable with $\sigma_{ij}(x,y)=\sigma_{ji}(y,x)$ for all $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$;
  • $\tau_{ij}(x,y):=w_i(x)q_j(y)\sigma_{ij}(x,y)$ for $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$ satisfies $\sum_{j\in I}\int\lambda({\rm d}y)\tau_{ij}(x,y)=1$ for all $(i,x)\in I\times E$ and $$\alpha_{ij}:=\left.\begin{cases}\displaystyle1\wedge\frac{w_j(y)p(y)q_i(x)}{w_i(x)p(x)q_j(y)}&\text{, if }w_i(x)p(x)q_j(y)>0\\1&\text{, otherwise}\end{cases}\right\}$$ for $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$
  • $k:=\sum_{i\in I}\sum_{j\in I}\alpha_{ij}\tau_{ij}$.

I've got a contractive self-adjoint linear integral operator $\kappa$ of the form $$(\kappa g)(x):=g(x)+\int\lambda({\rm d}y)k(x,y)(g(y)-g(x))\;\;\;\text{for }g\in L^2(\mu),$$ where $k$ depends on the choice of a family of "weights" $(w_i)_{i\in I}$ (see definitions below). We may assume that the spectrum $\sigma(\kappa)$ is contained in $[-1,1)$.

I want to determine a choice of $(w_i)_{i\in I}$ minimizing $\langle(1-\kappa)^{-1}f_0,f_0\rangle_{L^2(\mu)}$, where $f_0:=f-\int f\:{\rm d}\mu$ and $f$ is defined below. How can we solve this problem?

Maybe it's useful to consider the spectral measure $E:\mathcal B(\mathbb R)\to\mathfrak L(H)$ associated with $\kappa$ and write $$(1-\kappa)^{-1}=\int_{[-1,\:1)}\frac1{1-\lambda}\:E({\rm d}\lambda)\tag1,$$ but it's not clear to me how $E$ depends on $(w_i)_{i\in I}$.

Definitions:

  • $I$ is a finite set;
  • $p,q_i$ are probability densities on a measure space $(E,\mathcal E,\lambda)$;
  • $f\in\mathcal L^2(\lambda)$ with $\{p=0\}\subseteq\{f=0\}$;
  • $w_i:E\to\mathbb R$ is $\mathcal E$-measurable with $\{q_i=0\}\subseteq\{w_ip=0\}$ for $i\in I$ with $\{pf\ne0\}\subseteq\left\{\sum_{i\in I}w_i=1\right\}$;
  • $\sigma_{ij}:E^2\to\mathbb R$ be $\mathcal E^{\otimes2}$-measurable with $\sigma_{ij}(x,y)=\sigma_{ji}(y,x)$ for all $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$;
  • $\tau_{ij}(x,y):=w_i(x)q_j(y)\sigma_{ij}(x,y)$ for $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$ satisfies $\sum_{j\in I}\int\lambda({\rm d}y)\tau_{ij}(x,y)=1$ for all $(i,x)\in I\times E$ and $$\alpha_{ij}:=\left.\begin{cases}\displaystyle1\wedge\frac{w_j(y)p(y)q_i(x)}{w_i(x)p(x)q_j(y)}&\text{, if }w_i(x)p(x)q_j(y)>0\\1&\text{, otherwise}\end{cases}\right\}$$ for $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$
  • $k:=\sum_{i\in I}\sum_{j\in I}\alpha_{ij}\tau_{ij}$.

I've got a contractive self-adjoint linear integral operator $\kappa$ of the form $$(\kappa g)(x):=g(x)+\int\lambda({\rm d}y)k(x,y)(g(y)-g(x))\;\;\;\text{for }g\in L^2(\mu),$$ where $k$ depends on the choice of a family of "weights" $(w_i)_{i\in I}$ (see definitions below). We may assume that the spectrum $\sigma(\kappa)$ is contained in $[-1,1)$.

I want to determine a choice of $(w_i)_{i\in I}$ minimizing $\langle(1-\kappa)^{-1}f_0,f_0\rangle_{L^2(\mu)}$, where $f_0:=f-\int f\:{\rm d}\mu$ and $f$ is defined below. How can we solve this problem?

Maybe it's useful to consider the spectral measure $E:\mathcal B(\mathbb R)\to\mathfrak L(H)$ associated with $\kappa$ and write $$(1-\kappa)^{-1}=\int_{[-1,\:1)}\frac1{1-\lambda}\:E({\rm d}\lambda)\tag1,$$ but it's not clear to me how $E$ depends on $(w_i)_{i\in I}$.

Definitions:

  • $I$ is a finite set;
  • $p,q_i$ are probability densities on a measure space $(E,\mathcal E,\lambda)$;
  • $f\in\mathcal L^2(\lambda)$ with $\{p=0\}\subseteq\{f=0\}$;
  • $w_i:E\to\mathbb R$ is $\mathcal E$-measurable with $\{q_i=0\}\subseteq\{w_ip=0\}$ for $i\in I$ with $\{pf\ne0\}\subseteq\left\{\sum_{i\in I}w_i=1\right\}$;
  • $\sigma_{ij}:E^2\to\mathbb R$ is $\mathcal E^{\otimes2}$-measurable with $\sigma_{ij}(x,y)=\sigma_{ji}(y,x)$ for all $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$;
  • $\tau_{ij}(x,y):=w_i(x)q_j(y)\sigma_{ij}(x,y)$ for $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$ satisfies $\sum_{j\in I}\int\lambda({\rm d}y)\tau_{ij}(x,y)=1$ for all $(i,x)\in I\times E$ and $$\alpha_{ij}:=\left.\begin{cases}\displaystyle1\wedge\frac{w_j(y)p(y)q_i(x)}{w_i(x)p(x)q_j(y)}&\text{, if }w_i(x)p(x)q_j(y)>0\\1&\text{, otherwise}\end{cases}\right\}$$ for $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$
  • $k:=\sum_{i\in I}\sum_{j\in I}\alpha_{ij}\tau_{ij}$.
Source Link
0xbadf00d
  • 167
  • 1
  • 5
  • 16

Minimize $\langle(1-\kappa)^{-1}f,f\rangle$ for a parameter-dependent integral operator $\kappa$

I've got a contractive self-adjoint linear integral operator $\kappa$ of the form $$(\kappa g)(x):=g(x)+\int\lambda({\rm d}y)k(x,y)(g(y)-g(x))\;\;\;\text{for }g\in L^2(\mu),$$ where $k$ depends on the choice of a family of "weights" $(w_i)_{i\in I}$ (see definitions below). We may assume that the spectrum $\sigma(\kappa)$ is contained in $[-1,1)$.

I want to determine a choice of $(w_i)_{i\in I}$ minimizing $\langle(1-\kappa)^{-1}f_0,f_0\rangle_{L^2(\mu)}$, where $f_0:=f-\int f\:{\rm d}\mu$ and $f$ is defined below. How can we solve this problem?

Maybe it's useful to consider the spectral measure $E:\mathcal B(\mathbb R)\to\mathfrak L(H)$ associated with $\kappa$ and write $$(1-\kappa)^{-1}=\int_{[-1,\:1)}\frac1{1-\lambda}\:E({\rm d}\lambda)\tag1,$$ but it's not clear to me how $E$ depends on $(w_i)_{i\in I}$.

Definitions:

  • $I$ is a finite set;
  • $p,q_i$ are probability densities on a measure space $(E,\mathcal E,\lambda)$;
  • $f\in\mathcal L^2(\lambda)$ with $\{p=0\}\subseteq\{f=0\}$;
  • $w_i:E\to\mathbb R$ is $\mathcal E$-measurable with $\{q_i=0\}\subseteq\{w_ip=0\}$ for $i\in I$ with $\{pf\ne0\}\subseteq\left\{\sum_{i\in I}w_i=1\right\}$;
  • $\sigma_{ij}:E^2\to\mathbb R$ be $\mathcal E^{\otimes2}$-measurable with $\sigma_{ij}(x,y)=\sigma_{ji}(y,x)$ for all $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$;
  • $\tau_{ij}(x,y):=w_i(x)q_j(y)\sigma_{ij}(x,y)$ for $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$ satisfies $\sum_{j\in I}\int\lambda({\rm d}y)\tau_{ij}(x,y)=1$ for all $(i,x)\in I\times E$ and $$\alpha_{ij}:=\left.\begin{cases}\displaystyle1\wedge\frac{w_j(y)p(y)q_i(x)}{w_i(x)p(x)q_j(y)}&\text{, if }w_i(x)p(x)q_j(y)>0\\1&\text{, otherwise}\end{cases}\right\}$$ for $(i,x),(j,y)\in I\times E$
  • $k:=\sum_{i\in I}\sum_{j\in I}\alpha_{ij}\tau_{ij}$.