Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
S.Surace
  • 1.7k
  • 11
  • 22
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
revised the title
Link
S.Surace
  • 1.7k
  • 11
  • 22

What is How to define (and compute) the Cartan-Killing form of the group of volume-preserving diffeomorphisms?

added 18 characters in body
Source Link
S.Surace
  • 1.7k
  • 11
  • 22

This question was raised a while ago in a blog post by Terry Tao on the Euler-Arnold equation and he called it "quite tricky".

Has anyone in the meantime tried to formulate this question precisely, or to work it out?

I'm sketching here what I suppose the precise question should be (suggestions for improvement are very welcome). Let $M$ be a smooth orientable manifold and $\mu$ a volume form. Denote by

$$\mathfrak{g}=\text{SVect(M)}=\{X\in \text{Vect}(M)|\mathcal{L}_X\mu=0\}$$

the Lie algebra of divergence-free vector fields. The adjoint action of $\mathfrak{g}$ on itself is given by

$$ad: \mathfrak{g}\times\mathfrak{g}\to\mathfrak{g}, \quad ad(X)(Y)=[X,Y]=\mathcal{L}_XY. $$

Thus, the Cartan-Killing form evaluated on $X,Y\in\mathfrak{g}$ should be related to the product of Lie derivative operators $\mathcal{L}_X\mathcal{L}_Y$.

Some basic questions are

  1. How to define the Cartan-Killing form? Suppose that $M$ is compact and $g$ is a Riemannian metric on $g$. We may regard the completion of $\mathfrak{g}$ asto a Hilbert space with inner product $\langle X,Y \rangle=\int_Mg(X,Y)\mu$ (if $M$ is not compact, consider the sub-algebra of square integrable vector fields). Is $\mathcal{L}_X\mathcal{L}_Y$ a trace-class operator?
  2. What do we know about the relationships of SVect($M$) and $M$ that would help us identify the cases where the form can potentially be described more precisely? (I‘m thinking of things of the sort that are known about the Lie algebra of all vector fields, e.g. that M is uniquely determined by the algebraic structure of Vect($M$).)

This question was raised a while ago in a blog post by Terry Tao on the Euler-Arnold equation and he called it "quite tricky".

Has anyone in the meantime tried to formulate this question precisely, or to work it out?

I'm sketching here what I suppose the precise question should be (suggestions for improvement are very welcome). Let $M$ be a smooth orientable manifold and $\mu$ a volume form. Denote by

$$\mathfrak{g}=\text{SVect(M)}=\{X\in \text{Vect}(M)|\mathcal{L}_X\mu=0\}$$

the Lie algebra of divergence-free vector fields. The adjoint action of $\mathfrak{g}$ on itself is given by

$$ad: \mathfrak{g}\times\mathfrak{g}\to\mathfrak{g}, \quad ad(X)(Y)=[X,Y]=\mathcal{L}_XY. $$

Thus, the Cartan-Killing form evaluated on $X,Y\in\mathfrak{g}$ should be related to the product of Lie derivative operators $\mathcal{L}_X\mathcal{L}_Y$.

Some basic questions are

  1. How to define the Cartan-Killing form? Suppose that $M$ is compact and $g$ is a Riemannian metric on $g$. We may regard $\mathfrak{g}$ as a Hilbert space with inner product $\langle X,Y \rangle=\int_Mg(X,Y)\mu$ (if $M$ is not compact, consider the sub-algebra of square integrable vector fields). Is $\mathcal{L}_X\mathcal{L}_Y$ a trace-class operator?
  2. What do we know about the relationships of SVect($M$) and $M$ that would help us identify the cases where the form can potentially be described more precisely? (I‘m thinking of things of the sort that are known about the Lie algebra of all vector fields, e.g. that M is uniquely determined by the algebraic structure of Vect($M$).)

This question was raised a while ago in a blog post by Terry Tao on the Euler-Arnold equation and he called it "quite tricky".

Has anyone in the meantime tried to formulate this question precisely, or to work it out?

I'm sketching here what I suppose the precise question should be (suggestions for improvement are very welcome). Let $M$ be a smooth orientable manifold and $\mu$ a volume form. Denote by

$$\mathfrak{g}=\text{SVect(M)}=\{X\in \text{Vect}(M)|\mathcal{L}_X\mu=0\}$$

the Lie algebra of divergence-free vector fields. The adjoint action of $\mathfrak{g}$ on itself is given by

$$ad: \mathfrak{g}\times\mathfrak{g}\to\mathfrak{g}, \quad ad(X)(Y)=[X,Y]=\mathcal{L}_XY. $$

Thus, the Cartan-Killing form evaluated on $X,Y\in\mathfrak{g}$ should be related to the product of Lie derivative operators $\mathcal{L}_X\mathcal{L}_Y$.

Some basic questions are

  1. How to define the Cartan-Killing form? Suppose that $M$ is compact and $g$ is a Riemannian metric on $g$. We may regard the completion of $\mathfrak{g}$ to a Hilbert space with inner product $\langle X,Y \rangle=\int_Mg(X,Y)\mu$ (if $M$ is not compact, consider the sub-algebra of square integrable vector fields). Is $\mathcal{L}_X\mathcal{L}_Y$ a trace-class operator?
  2. What do we know about the relationships of SVect($M$) and $M$ that would help us identify the cases where the form can potentially be described more precisely? (I‘m thinking of things of the sort that are known about the Lie algebra of all vector fields, e.g. that M is uniquely determined by the algebraic structure of Vect($M$).)
refined the question
Source Link
S.Surace
  • 1.7k
  • 11
  • 22
Loading
added 422 characters in body
Source Link
S.Surace
  • 1.7k
  • 11
  • 22
Loading
edited tags
Link
Willie Wong
  • 39.1k
  • 4
  • 94
  • 176
Loading
Notice added Draw attention by S.Surace
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by S.Surace
edited title
Link
S.Surace
  • 1.7k
  • 11
  • 22
Loading
Source Link
S.Surace
  • 1.7k
  • 11
  • 22
Loading