Skip to main content
added top-level tags and other relevant tags
Source Link
Ricardo Andrade
  • 6.2k
  • 5
  • 42
  • 69

I would like to understand, in some formal sense, the relation between the Dirac operator and the line length introduced by Connes in noncommutative geometry. If $D$ is the Dirac operator, he sets $ds=D^{-1}$$ds = D^{-1}$ and so, it should be possible to get a measure of a line length on a manifold using this ansatz. If the manifold is Minkowski and the DIracDirac operator is the standard one $D=i\gamma\cdot\partial$$D = i\gamma\cdot\partial$ where $\gamma$s belong to a Clifford algebra and are constants, how can I formally derive the variational principle of special relativity $$ {\cal L}=\int \sqrt{dx_0^2-dx_1^2-dx_2^2-dx_3^2} $$$$ {\cal L} = \int \sqrt{dx_0^2-dx_1^2-dx_2^2-dx_3^2} $$ with $\delta{\cal L}=0$$\delta{\cal L} = 0$ for the geodesic curves? Is such a question meaningful?

I would like to understand, in some formal sense, the relation between the Dirac operator and the line length introduced by Connes in noncommutative geometry. If $D$ is the Dirac operator, he sets $ds=D^{-1}$ and so, it should be possible to get a measure of a line length on a manifold using this ansatz. If the manifold is Minkowski and the DIrac operator is the standard one $D=i\gamma\cdot\partial$ where $\gamma$s belong to a Clifford algebra and are constants, how can I formally derive the variational principle of special relativity $$ {\cal L}=\int \sqrt{dx_0^2-dx_1^2-dx_2^2-dx_3^2} $$ with $\delta{\cal L}=0$ for the geodesic curves? Is such a question meaningful?

I would like to understand, in some formal sense, the relation between the Dirac operator and the line length introduced by Connes in noncommutative geometry. If $D$ is the Dirac operator, he sets $ds = D^{-1}$ and so, it should be possible to get a measure of a line length on a manifold using this ansatz. If the manifold is Minkowski and the Dirac operator is the standard one $D = i\gamma\cdot\partial$ where $\gamma$s belong to a Clifford algebra and are constants, how can I formally derive the variational principle of special relativity $$ {\cal L} = \int \sqrt{dx_0^2-dx_1^2-dx_2^2-dx_3^2} $$ with $\delta{\cal L} = 0$ for the geodesic curves? Is such a question meaningful?

English fixed
Source Link
Jon
  • 1.7k
  • 1
  • 10
  • 15

I would like to understand, in some formal sense, the relation between the Dirac operator and the line length introduced by Connes in noncommutative geometry. If $D$ is the Dirac operator, he sets $ds=D^{-1}$ and so, it should be possible to get a measure of a line length on a manifold using this ansatz. If the manifold is Minkowski and the DIrac operator is the standard one $D=i\gamma\cdot\partial$ where $\gamma$ belongss belong to a Clifford algebra and are constants, how can I formally derive the variational principle of special relativity $$ {\cal L}=\int \sqrt{dx_0^2-dx_1^-dx_2^2-dx_3^2} $$$$ {\cal L}=\int \sqrt{dx_0^2-dx_1^2-dx_2^2-dx_3^2} $$ with $\delta{\cal L}=0$ for the geodesic curves? Is such a question meaningful?

I would like to understand, in some formal sense, the relation between the Dirac operator and the line length introduced by Connes in noncommutative geometry. If $D$ is the Dirac operator, he sets $ds=D^{-1}$ and so, it should be possible to get a measure of a line length on a manifold using this ansatz. If the manifold is Minkowski and the DIrac operator is the standard one $D=i\gamma\cdot\partial$ where $\gamma$ belongs to a Clifford algebra and are constants, how can I formally derive the variational principle of special relativity $$ {\cal L}=\int \sqrt{dx_0^2-dx_1^-dx_2^2-dx_3^2} $$ with $\delta{\cal L}=0$ for the geodesic curves? Is such a question meaningful?

I would like to understand, in some formal sense, the relation between the Dirac operator and the line length introduced by Connes in noncommutative geometry. If $D$ is the Dirac operator, he sets $ds=D^{-1}$ and so, it should be possible to get a measure of a line length on a manifold using this ansatz. If the manifold is Minkowski and the DIrac operator is the standard one $D=i\gamma\cdot\partial$ where $\gamma$s belong to a Clifford algebra and are constants, how can I formally derive the variational principle of special relativity $$ {\cal L}=\int \sqrt{dx_0^2-dx_1^2-dx_2^2-dx_3^2} $$ with $\delta{\cal L}=0$ for the geodesic curves? Is such a question meaningful?

Source Link
Jon
  • 1.7k
  • 1
  • 10
  • 15

Noncommutative geometry and line length

I would like to understand, in some formal sense, the relation between the Dirac operator and the line length introduced by Connes in noncommutative geometry. If $D$ is the Dirac operator, he sets $ds=D^{-1}$ and so, it should be possible to get a measure of a line length on a manifold using this ansatz. If the manifold is Minkowski and the DIrac operator is the standard one $D=i\gamma\cdot\partial$ where $\gamma$ belongs to a Clifford algebra and are constants, how can I formally derive the variational principle of special relativity $$ {\cal L}=\int \sqrt{dx_0^2-dx_1^-dx_2^2-dx_3^2} $$ with $\delta{\cal L}=0$ for the geodesic curves? Is such a question meaningful?