Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Draw attention by Ali Taghavi
Bounty Started worth 100 reputation by Ali Taghavi
edited tags
Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

Let $X=P\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+Q\frac{\partial}{\partial y}$ be a polynomial vector field on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$. Consider the following (Moyal) operator on $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$:

$\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=f_{x}*P+f_{y}*Q$ or $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=P*f_{x}+Q*f_{y}$ where $*$ is the Moyal product. The later has the potential of being an elliptic operator since it is of even degreeorder.

This is a noncommutative version of the standard derivation $D_{X}(f)=f_{x}P+f_{y}Q$:

I have two questions:

  1. Motivated by the Leibniz formula for $D_{X}$, I ask that: what is a natural formula for $\tilde{D}_{X}(f*g)=?$

2)Can the number of limit cycles of $X$ be bounded by the codimension of the range of $\tilde{D}_{X}$?

In particular is the following statement, true?

  • For a limit cycle $\gamma$ of a vector field $X$ on the plane and for an smooth function $f$ on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$, there is a point $p$ on $\gamma$ such that $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)(p)=0$.

A (commutative) motivation for the second question is the question in the following post

Note The * statement is a Moyal version of a key lemma to prove the commutative version of the second question. By commutative version I mean we replace the Moyal product by the usual product.

Let $X=P\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+Q\frac{\partial}{\partial y}$ be a polynomial vector field on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$. Consider the following (Moyal) operator on $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$:

$\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=f_{x}*P+f_{y}*Q$ or $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=P*f_{x}+Q*f_{y}$ where $*$ is the Moyal product. The later has the potential of being an elliptic operator since it is of even degree.

This is a noncommutative version of the standard derivation $D_{X}(f)=f_{x}P+f_{y}Q$:

I have two questions:

  1. Motivated by the Leibniz formula for $D_{X}$, I ask that: what is a natural formula for $\tilde{D}_{X}(f*g)=?$

2)Can the number of limit cycles of $X$ be bounded by the codimension of the range of $\tilde{D}_{X}$?

In particular is the following statement, true?

  • For a limit cycle $\gamma$ of a vector field $X$ on the plane and for an smooth function $f$ on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$, there is a point $p$ on $\gamma$ such that $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)(p)=0$.

A (commutative) motivation for the second question is the question in the following post

Note The * statement is a Moyal version of a key lemma to prove the commutative version of the second question. By commutative version I mean we replace the Moyal product by the usual product.

Let $X=P\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+Q\frac{\partial}{\partial y}$ be a polynomial vector field on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$. Consider the following (Moyal) operator on $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$:

$\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=f_{x}*P+f_{y}*Q$ or $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=P*f_{x}+Q*f_{y}$ where $*$ is the Moyal product. The later has the potential of being an elliptic operator since it is of even order.

This is a noncommutative version of the standard derivation $D_{X}(f)=f_{x}P+f_{y}Q$:

I have two questions:

  1. Motivated by the Leibniz formula for $D_{X}$, I ask that: what is a natural formula for $\tilde{D}_{X}(f*g)=?$

2)Can the number of limit cycles of $X$ be bounded by the codimension of the range of $\tilde{D}_{X}$?

In particular is the following statement, true?

  • For a limit cycle $\gamma$ of a vector field $X$ on the plane and for an smooth function $f$ on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$, there is a point $p$ on $\gamma$ such that $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)(p)=0$.

A (commutative) motivation for the second question is the question in the following post

Note The * statement is a Moyal version of a key lemma to prove the commutative version of the second question. By commutative version I mean we replace the Moyal product by the usual product.

added 93 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

Let $X=P\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+Q\frac{\partial}{\partial y}$ be a polynomial vector field on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$. Consider the following (Moyal) operator on $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$:

$\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=f_{x}*P+f_{y}*Q$ or $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=P*f_{x}+Q*f_{y}$ where $*$ is the Moyal product. The later has the potential of being an elliptic operator since it is of even degree.

This is a noncommutative version of the standard derivation $D_{X}(f)=f_{x}P+f_{y}Q$:

I have two questions:

  1. Motivated by the Leibniz formula for $D_{X}$, I ask that: what is a natural formula for $\tilde{D}_{X}(f*g)=?$

2)Can the number of limit cycles of $X$ be bounded by the codimension of the range of $\tilde{D}_{X}$?

In particular is the following statement, true?

  • For a limit cycle $\gamma$ of a vector field $X$ on the plane and for an smooth function $f$ on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$, there is a point $p$ on $\gamma$ such that $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)(p)=0$.

A (commutative) motivation for the second question is the question in the following post

Note The * statement is a Moyal version of a key lemma to prove the commutative version of the second question. By commutative version I mean we replace the Moyal product by the usual product.

Let $X=P\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+Q\frac{\partial}{\partial y}$ be a polynomial vector field on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$. Consider the following (Moyal) operator on $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$:

$\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=f_{x}*P+f_{y}*Q$ or $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=P*f_{x}+Q*f_{y}$ where $*$ is the Moyal product. This is a noncommutative version of the standard derivation $D_{X}(f)=f_{x}P+f_{y}Q$:

I have two questions:

  1. Motivated by the Leibniz formula for $D_{X}$, I ask that: what is a natural formula for $\tilde{D}_{X}(f*g)=?$

2)Can the number of limit cycles of $X$ be bounded by the codimension of the range of $\tilde{D}_{X}$?

In particular is the following statement, true?

  • For a limit cycle $\gamma$ of a vector field $X$ on the plane and for an smooth function $f$ on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$, there is a point $p$ on $\gamma$ such that $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)(p)=0$.

A (commutative) motivation for the second question is the question in the following post

Note The * statement is a Moyal version of a key lemma to prove the commutative version of the second question. By commutative version I mean we replace the Moyal product by the usual product.

Let $X=P\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+Q\frac{\partial}{\partial y}$ be a polynomial vector field on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$. Consider the following (Moyal) operator on $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$:

$\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=f_{x}*P+f_{y}*Q$ or $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)=P*f_{x}+Q*f_{y}$ where $*$ is the Moyal product. The later has the potential of being an elliptic operator since it is of even degree.

This is a noncommutative version of the standard derivation $D_{X}(f)=f_{x}P+f_{y}Q$:

I have two questions:

  1. Motivated by the Leibniz formula for $D_{X}$, I ask that: what is a natural formula for $\tilde{D}_{X}(f*g)=?$

2)Can the number of limit cycles of $X$ be bounded by the codimension of the range of $\tilde{D}_{X}$?

In particular is the following statement, true?

  • For a limit cycle $\gamma$ of a vector field $X$ on the plane and for an smooth function $f$ on $\mathbb{R}^{2}$, there is a point $p$ on $\gamma$ such that $\tilde{D}_{X}(f)(p)=0$.

A (commutative) motivation for the second question is the question in the following post

Note The * statement is a Moyal version of a key lemma to prove the commutative version of the second question. By commutative version I mean we replace the Moyal product by the usual product.

added 36 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link
Loading
Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
edited tags
Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
Notice added Authoritative reference needed by Ali Taghavi
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Ali Taghavi
deleted 6 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
added 20 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
edited tags
Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
added 437 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading