Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

Post Closed as "Needs details or clarity" by Ricardo Andrade, Stefan Kohl♦, Andrey Rekalo, Willie Wong, Theo Johnson-Freyd
replaced new tags
Source Link
Ricardo Andrade
Ricardo Andrade
  • 6.2k
  • 5
  • 42
  • 69

There are two fundamental identities for n-ary generalizations of the Jacobi identity. One fundamental identity is right for Nambu mechanics and such the, the other for L_\infty algebras as in CSFT. Which is physically relevant for double field theory? forFor fluxes?

There are two fundamental identities for n-ary generalizations of the Jacobi identity. One fundamental identity is right for Nambu mechanics and such the other for L_\infty algebras as in CSFT Which is physically relevant for double field theory? for fluxes?

There are two fundamental identities for n-ary generalizations of the Jacobi identity. One fundamental identity is right for Nambu mechanics and such, the other for L_\infty algebras as in CSFT. Which is physically relevant for double field theory? For fluxes?

added the tag math physics
Link
edit approved Jan 24, 2014 at 20:25
F. C.
edit approved Jan 24, 2014 at 20:25
F. C.
  • 3.6k
  • 21
  • 30
Source Link
Jim Stasheff
Jim Stasheff
  • 3.9k
  • 16
  • 24

Physical relevance of either fundamental identity generalizing Jacobi

There are two fundamental identities for n-ary generalizations of the Jacobi identity. One fundamental identity is right for Nambu mechanics and such the other for L_\infty algebras as in CSFT Which is physically relevant for double field theory? for fluxes?