Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with Liviu Nicolaescu's answer chosen by CommunityBot
Notice added Draw attention by warsaga
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by warsaga
added 422 characters in body
Source Link
warsaga
  • 1.3k
  • 12
  • 22

What methods are there to show symmetry properties of the minimizer of a problem $\inf_{u\in X}\mathcal{F}(u)$ in the calculus of variations? In general, the symmetry properties of $\mathcal{F}$ do not imply the symmetry of its minimizers. However, the minimizer may possess some weaker symmetry. More precisely, I am interested in functions $u$ defined on the sphere $S^2$. Even if $\mathcal{F}(u(R\cdot))=\mathcal{F}(u)$ for all rotations $R$ this does not imply that the solution is rotationally invariant (and therefore constant). Is it possible to formulate conditions on $\mathcal{F}$ that guarantee that each minimizer is rotationally symmetric around an axis?

Edit: If there is more than one minimizer $$\mathcal{F}(u(R\cdot))=\mathcal{F}(u) \text{ for all rotations } R$$ then this does not imply that all minimizers are symmetric with respect to any rotation. Instead, for each minimizer $u(\cdot)$ its rotated version is $u(R\cdot)$ is a minimizer, too. What tools are available to show that all minimizers possess a weaker symmetry e.g. symmetric with respect to one axis. The functional $\mathcal{F}$ of interest is a the sum of a convex and a non-convex bilinear part.

What methods are there to show symmetry properties of the minimizer of a problem $\inf_{u\in X}\mathcal{F}(u)$ in the calculus of variations? In general, the symmetry properties of $\mathcal{F}$ do not imply the symmetry of its minimizers. However, the minimizer may possess some weaker symmetry. More precisely, I am interested in functions $u$ defined on the sphere $S^2$. Even if $\mathcal{F}(u(R\cdot))=\mathcal{F}(u)$ for all rotations $R$ this does not imply that the solution is rotationally invariant (and therefore constant). Is it possible to formulate conditions on $\mathcal{F}$ that guarantee that each minimizer is rotationally symmetric around an axis?

What methods are there to show symmetry properties of the minimizer of a problem $\inf_{u\in X}\mathcal{F}(u)$ in the calculus of variations? In general, the symmetry properties of $\mathcal{F}$ do not imply the symmetry of its minimizers. However, the minimizer may possess some weaker symmetry. More precisely, I am interested in functions $u$ defined on the sphere $S^2$. Even if $\mathcal{F}(u(R\cdot))=\mathcal{F}(u)$ for all rotations $R$ this does not imply that the solution is rotationally invariant (and therefore constant). Is it possible to formulate conditions on $\mathcal{F}$ that guarantee that each minimizer is rotationally symmetric around an axis?

Edit: If there is more than one minimizer $$\mathcal{F}(u(R\cdot))=\mathcal{F}(u) \text{ for all rotations } R$$ then this does not imply that all minimizers are symmetric with respect to any rotation. Instead, for each minimizer $u(\cdot)$ its rotated version is $u(R\cdot)$ is a minimizer, too. What tools are available to show that all minimizers possess a weaker symmetry e.g. symmetric with respect to one axis. The functional $\mathcal{F}$ of interest is a the sum of a convex and a non-convex bilinear part.

added 1 characters in body
Source Link
warsaga
  • 1.3k
  • 12
  • 22

What methods are there to show symmetry properties of the minimizer of a problem $\inf_{u\in X}\mathcal{F}(u)$ in the calculus of variations? In general, the symmetry properties of $\mathcal{F}$ do not imply the symmetry of its minimizers. However, the minimizer may possespossess some weaker symmetry. More precisely, I am interested in functions $u$ defined on the sphere $S^2$. Even if $\mathcal{F}(u(R\cdot))=\mathcal{F}(u)$ for all rotations $R$ this does not imply that the solution is rotationally invariant (and therefore constant). Is it possible to formulate conditions on $\mathcal{F}$ that guarantee that each minimizer is rotationally symmetric around an axis?

What methods are there to show symmetry properties of the minimizer of a problem $\inf_{u\in X}\mathcal{F}(u)$ in the calculus of variations? In general, the symmetry properties of $\mathcal{F}$ do not imply the symmetry of its minimizers. However, the minimizer may posses some weaker symmetry. More precisely, I am interested in functions $u$ defined on the sphere $S^2$. Even if $\mathcal{F}(u(R\cdot))=\mathcal{F}(u)$ for all rotations $R$ this does not imply that the solution is rotationally invariant (and therefore constant). Is it possible to formulate conditions on $\mathcal{F}$ that guarantee that each minimizer is rotationally symmetric around an axis?

What methods are there to show symmetry properties of the minimizer of a problem $\inf_{u\in X}\mathcal{F}(u)$ in the calculus of variations? In general, the symmetry properties of $\mathcal{F}$ do not imply the symmetry of its minimizers. However, the minimizer may possess some weaker symmetry. More precisely, I am interested in functions $u$ defined on the sphere $S^2$. Even if $\mathcal{F}(u(R\cdot))=\mathcal{F}(u)$ for all rotations $R$ this does not imply that the solution is rotationally invariant (and therefore constant). Is it possible to formulate conditions on $\mathcal{F}$ that guarantee that each minimizer is rotationally symmetric around an axis?

Source Link
warsaga
  • 1.3k
  • 12
  • 22

Symmetry Properties of Minimizers - Calculus of Variations

What methods are there to show symmetry properties of the minimizer of a problem $\inf_{u\in X}\mathcal{F}(u)$ in the calculus of variations? In general, the symmetry properties of $\mathcal{F}$ do not imply the symmetry of its minimizers. However, the minimizer may posses some weaker symmetry. More precisely, I am interested in functions $u$ defined on the sphere $S^2$. Even if $\mathcal{F}(u(R\cdot))=\mathcal{F}(u)$ for all rotations $R$ this does not imply that the solution is rotationally invariant (and therefore constant). Is it possible to formulate conditions on $\mathcal{F}$ that guarantee that each minimizer is rotationally symmetric around an axis?