Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Here's another way to get the lower bound of $\lVert A \rVert^n \gg \lvert\det(A)\rvert \gg p^{n-k+1}$. Namely, take a nonsingular $A$ of rank $\leq k-1$ and let $L$ be the lattice $A \mathbb Z^{n}$. Then $L \subset p\mathbb Z^{n} + \text{span of }k-1 \text{ vectors}$, so that $[0,p]^n$ is cut by $L$ into pieces of volume roughly $\text{Vol}([0,p])^n / p^{k-1}$ and you get the lower bound on $\text{Vol}(L)$ you want.
This is very similar to "convergence in $L^1$ $\implies$ convergence almost everywhere?", and it seems you can use this to produce counterexamples. FWIW, one situation where I think the implication holds, is when $\Omega$ has a nice topology, $E_1 = \mathbb C$, $f$ is jointly continuous and $L^p$-holomorphic. When you then write $f(u, \omega) - f(0, \omega) = u f'(0, \omega) + u R(u, \omega)$; you can use Cauchy's integral formula to prove that $f'$ and $R$ are jointly continuous, and then $R \to 0$ in $L^p$ implies $R \to 0$ everywhere; i.e. $f$ is pointwise holomorphic (=for fixed $\omega$).