revised
Do most manifolds have symmetries? or not?
edited tags
Loading…
comment
Do most manifolds have symmetries? or not?
Any finite order diffeomorphism of a closed manifold that fixes a point and the tangent space at that point is the identity (choose an invariant Riemannian metric and shoot geodesics away from that point). In particular $Diff_\partial(D^d)$ is torsion-free (extend the diffeomorphism to the sphere and use the above).
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
awarded
revised
Base-change for simplicial spaces
edited tags
Loading…
revised
Homotopy groups of spaces of embeddings
deleted 2 characters in body
Loading…
revised
Homotopy groups of spaces of embeddings
edited tags
Loading…
revised
Local topology of Whitney stratified spaces
edited tags
Loading…
awarded
comment
What is known about exotic spheres up to stable diffeomorphism?
The fact that the kernel of $\eta^B$ for $B=\tau_{\ge k+1}BO$ (this is $BO\langle k\rangle$ in your notation, if I am not mistaken) is trivial follows from classical surgery, Kervaire--Milnor style: If $\Sigma$ is in the kernel of $\eta^B$, then it bounds a $k$-parallelisable $(2k+1)$-manifold. Doing surgery on in the interior of $W$, we see that $\Sigma$ bounds a $k$-connected $(2k+1)$-manifold $W'$. By Poincaré duality, $W'$ is contractible, so $W'\cong D^{2k+1}$ by the $h$-cobordism theorem, and thus $\Sigma\cong S^{2k}$.
comment
What is known about exotic spheres up to stable diffeomorphism?
As an aside: In odd dimensions $8k-1$, the kernel of the map $\Theta_{8k−1}/bP_{8k}\rightarrow\Omega^B_{8k-1}$ for $B=\tau_{4n}BO$ the $(4n-1)$-connected cover was determined only recently by Burklund--Hahn--Senger and Burklund--Senger, see arxiv.org/abs/1910.14116 and arxiv.org/abs/2007.05127 .
comment
What is known about exotic spheres up to stable diffeomorphism?
Here $\overline{\Sigma}$ is $\Sigma$ with the opposite orientation---the inverse in the group of homotopy spheres.
comment
What is known about exotic spheres up to stable diffeomorphism?
Just to clarify: no appeal to Kreck's work is necessary to answer the original question when exotic spheres are stably diffeomorphic. $\Sigma \sharp W_g\cong \Sigma'\sharp W_h$ implies $g=h$ by consulting the Euler characteristic. But then $W_g\cong \overline{\Sigma}\sharp \Sigma \sharp W_g\cong \overline{\Sigma}\sharp \Sigma'\sharp W_g$ and thus $\overline{\Sigma}\sharp \Sigma'\cong S^{2n}$ since the inertia group is trivial, so $\Sigma\cong\Sigma'$.
revised
Loading…
comment
Normalizers in arithmetic groups
@JHM H is finite, so in particular arithmetic. The OP asked whether N(H) is arithmetic, not whether it is an arithmetic subgroup of G.
revised
Normalizers in arithmetic groups
added 17 characters in body
Loading…
awarded