Skip to main content
16 votes

Radon-Nikodym theorem for non-sigma finite measures

The measure spaces for which all of the nice theorems about $\sigma$-finite measures (except those about product measures, which require other generalizations) generalize are called localizable ...
Cameron Zwarich's user avatar
13 votes
Accepted

Sets that project to zero measure on all lines except one

Consider a sequence of rational numbers $s_i$ with the following property: For each rational number $s$ and nonnegative integer $n$, there exists $i$ such that $ s=s_i =s_{i+1} = \dots = s_{i+n}$, and ...
Will Sawin's user avatar
  • 148k
11 votes
Accepted

If $\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(E)=0$ then $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ is connected

Yes, $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$ has to be path-connected. Let $x,y\in\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$, we will prove that there are many paths going from $x$ to $y$ inside $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus E$. We can ...
Saúl RM's user avatar
  • 10.6k
9 votes
Accepted

Bounding an "integral" from below by the Hausdorff measure of the domain

It is true and deserves to be known better (it is morally equivalent to the statement that the Frostman lemma is just an exercise in linear programming duality though there are some pesky details I ...
fedja's user avatar
  • 61.9k
9 votes
Accepted

Computing a limit on the unit sphere: Riemann Lebesgue?

The key fact here is the (surprising, initially, but well known) (power) decay of $\widehat{\sigma}(\xi)$. If $u\in C^{\infty}(S)$, we can extend to a function $u_0\in C^{\infty}_0(\mathbb R^d)$, and ...
Christian Remling's user avatar
9 votes
Accepted

Finiteness of Hausdorff measure of balls

As a counterexample, let $X$ be an infinite-dimensional normed space. For $\varepsilon<r/2$ it follows from Borsuk-Ulam that you need more than $n$ closed sets of diameter $\varepsilon$ to cover ...
Martin Väth's user avatar
  • 1,869
8 votes
Accepted

Fubini's theorem for Hausdorff measures

If $s>1$, then clearly $H^s(B_x)=0$ so there is nothing to do. If $s=1$, $H^1$ is just the Lebesgue measure so measurability follows. If $0<s<1$ the situation is a way more complicated, but ...
Piotr Hajlasz's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Hausdorff dimension of the boundary of fibres of Lipschitz maps

Unfortunately, you can always find a Lipschitz map $$ f:\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}^{m-k} \quad \text{and} \quad y\in\mathbb{R}^{m-k} $$ such that $\partial f^{-1}(y)$ has positive $m$-dimensional ...
Piotr Hajlasz's user avatar
8 votes

Sets that project to zero measure on all lines except one

This can be done with an iterated Venetian blind construction. The idea is you start with a horizontal line segment, replace it with many small rotated parallel line segments, and repeat. In each step,...
Alan C's user avatar
  • 613
7 votes
Accepted

Is Hausdorff Measure equal to Hausdorff Content on rectifiable (metric) spaces?

In general, no. For example, $X$ may be a countably infinite collection of lines through the origin in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Then $X$ is $1$-rectifiable. For any ball $B$ centered at the origin, $B\cap X$ ...
user147874's user avatar
7 votes

Radon-Nikodym theorem for non-sigma finite measures

One can formulate the Radon-Nikodym so that it applies to all measure spaces without any restriction. Let $(X,\Sigma,\nu)$ be a measure space and $\nu$ be a real valued signed measure on $\Sigma$. ...
Michael Greinecker's user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Hausdorff measure

Not true for all $X$. Taking the gauge function $\phi(t) = t^{1/2}/\log|t|$, construct a Cantor set $X$ in $\mathbb R$ using Hausdorff's original method so that $H^\phi(X) = 1$. Then the Hausdorff ...
Gerald Edgar's user avatar
  • 41.1k
6 votes
Accepted

Continuity of Hausdorff measure on level sets

As Leo Moos suggested in the comments, in any dimension $d$, this is a simple consequence of the implicit function theorem. The implicit function theorem implies that every point $x\in\phi^{-1}(0)$ ...
Kostya_I's user avatar
  • 8,992
5 votes

Generalization of area and coarea formula for fractional Hausdorff measures

There are several intersting consequences of this abstract viewpoint about these formulas. I also would have liked to discuss why the coarea inequality is the backbone of the coarea formula, but let ...
Behnam Esmayli's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

The product of two Hausdorff measures

As noted in a comment, for Riemannian manifolds, the Hausdorff measures are equal to (up to a constant) the usual volumes. So this works. The metric case you mention can fail. There are metric ...
Gerald Edgar's user avatar
  • 41.1k
5 votes
Accepted

Hausdorff dimension of Julia set

This argument is from Eremenko-Lyubich survey: Let $f$ be a rational map and $\mu$ an $f$-invariant ergodic measure on $\widehat{\Bbb{C}}$. By Ledrappier-Young entropy formula, $h_\mu(f)$ is the ...
KhashF's user avatar
  • 3,599
5 votes

If $\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(K)=0$ then $\mathcal{H}^n(K\times \mathbb{R})=0$

Frostman's lemma seems to work for this problem. Suppose that $H^n(K\times\mathbb{R})>0$. Then $H^n(K\times[0,1])>0$, so there is a measure $\mu$ in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ with $\mu(K\times[0,1])>...
Saúl RM's user avatar
  • 10.6k
4 votes
Accepted

Hausdorff dimension and surface measure

Section 3.3.4D in Evans and Gariepy "Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions". Chapter 3 of Federer's "Geometric Measure Theory" is also a canonical reference.
Quarto Bendir's user avatar
4 votes

Average of the sum of dirac measures

I assume that by maximal you mean with respect to inclusion. Then the answer is no. Consider the following counterexample on the real line: Let $\mathcal{B}_\epsilon := \epsilon\mathbb{Z}$ and $\...
mlk's user avatar
  • 2,504
4 votes
Accepted

If $\mathcal{H}^{n-1}(K)=0$ then $\mathcal{H}^n(K\times \mathbb{R})=0$

$\newcommand\de\delta\newcommand\ep\varepsilon\newcommand\R{\mathbb R}\newcommand\N{\mathbb N}$Saúl RM proved the desired result by an application of Frostman's lemma. Here is an elementary proof: ...
Iosif Pinelis's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Extending a $C^1$ function on $\mathbb R^n$ to a set of finite $\mathcal H^{n-2}$ measure

The claim holds under the much weaker assumption that the exceptional set satisfies $\mathcal H^{n-1}(E)=0$. Since the limits of $f$ and $\nabla f$ exist everywhere we get two continuous functions $F\...
Jochen Wengenroth's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

A question about the maximal function

The answer is no. Let $m$ be a very large positive constant. You can find smooth $f$ that equals $m$ on a small ball $B_R(0)$ and still satisfy $\int_{B_6(0)}|f|<\delta$. You can do it with $R$ ...
Piotr Hajlasz's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Is there an explicit, everywhere surjective $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ whose graph has zero Hausdorff measure in its dimension?

Here is a way to do it without the axiom of choice, but it isn't a nice formula either. Consider a Cantor set $C\subseteq[0,1]$ with Hausdorff dimension $0$. Now consider a countable disjoint union $\...
Saúl RM's user avatar
  • 10.6k
3 votes

Hausdorff dimension of Julia set

Here is a fairly elementary argument, which works in great generality (in particular for rational and transcendental entire functions, and indeed suitably modified for meromorphic functions and ...
Lasse Rempe's user avatar
  • 6,548
3 votes

Continuity of Hausdorff measure on level sets

Not a complete answer, but just some ideas that are too long for a comment. Note: Here we use $\mathcal H^n, \mathcal L^n$ to denote the Hausdorff and Lebesgue measure respectively. Let $\Omega \...
Nate River's user avatar
  • 6,223
3 votes

Recovering the length metric from Hausdorff measure

The easiest argument I know (which works for path-metrics on topological manifolds $X$ and in even greater generality) is to consider the induced map $f^2: X^2\to Y^2$. This map also preserves the ...
Moishe Kohan's user avatar
  • 12.3k
3 votes
Accepted

volume of region between two manifolds

If $C_1$ and $C_2$ are the boundary components of an $\epsilon$-neighborhood of $C$, then the volume of the region is $2\epsilon$ times the volume of $C$. This is a special case of the Weyl tube ...
Ivan Izmestiev's user avatar
3 votes

Hausdorff approximating measures and Borel sets

There is a difference between $m = n$ and $m < n$. In case $m=n$, all the outher measures $\mathscr H^n_\delta$ are equal to the Lebesgue measure. So each Borel set in $\mathbb R^n$ is $\mathscr H^...
rozu's user avatar
  • 920
3 votes
Accepted

Gromov-Hausdorff distance between weighted tree graphs

I would direct you to Theorem 7.3.25 of the book "A Course in Metric Geometry" by Burago-Burago-Ivanov. Roughly speaking, the Gromov-Hausdorff distance between two compact metric spaces can be ...
user145709's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Why is the Hausdorff measure of this set zero?

The next result answers the question in the negative. Theorem. There is $\phi:\mathbb{R}^n\supset\Omega\to\mathbb{R}^n$ of class $C^\infty$ such that $\phi$ is a local diffeomorphism in a ...
Piotr Hajlasz's user avatar

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible