Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 9833
2 votes

Formal power series is Taylor expansion of rational function iff Hankel determinants vanish?

I am not going to add anything new, just what is my take on it. The proof consists of four really simple steps. Step I. Determinant is zero iff there exist numbers $b_0,\dots,b_N$, not all of them z …
Alex Gavrilov's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Boundary behavior of power series vs. boundedness of partial sums

I think this question is odd because boundedness of $S_N(\xi)$ is a very weak condition whereas existence of an analytic continuation to some open neighborhood of $\xi$ (and even much less nice behav …
Alex Gavrilov's user avatar
4 votes

Comparing two power-series

Here is a proof of the formula $$\sum_{j>0} \frac{1}{j} w(q)^j P_qw(q)^{-j}=2\log \frac{w(q)}{q}-\log w'(q).$$ (The notation is the same as in the Timothy's answer except I prefer $P_qf(q)$ to $[q^{> …
Alex Gavrilov's user avatar
0 votes

An apparently simple question (behaviour at infinity of a power series)

If there is an uniform convergence, then, for example, $c_n=\sum_{k=0}^n a_kn^k$ will do. But no "reasonable" sequence will work in general, I agree with Loïc Teyssier on this. To say more, one has to …
Alex Gavrilov's user avatar