Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 9417

Non-commutative rings and algebras, non-associative algebras, universal algebra and lattice theory, linear algebra, semigroups. For questions specific to commutative algebra (that is, rings that are assumed both associative and commutative), rather use the tag ac.commutative-algebra.

2 votes
Accepted

Quasi-Lie algebras in nature?

Tom Goodwillie: The homotopy groups of a (say, simply connected) space $X$ form a graded Lie algebra under Whitehead product, in which the even-dimensional part (which is actually the $\pi_n$ for …
8 votes
2 answers
1k views

Quasi-Lie algebras in nature?

A Lie algebra over $\mathbb Z$ is defined to be an abelian group with a bracketing operation $[\cdot,\cdot]$, satisfying the Jacobi identity and the relation $[x,x]=0$ for every $x$. On the other hand …
Jim Conant's user avatar
  • 4,898
0 votes
0 answers
286 views

Good and/or standard notation for the abelianization of a Lie algebra

I'd like to solicit good notations for the abelianization of a Lie algebra $\mathfrak g$. One could write $\mathfrak g/[\mathfrak g,\mathfrak g]$, or even $H_1(\mathfrak g)$ but I'd like something tha …
Jim Conant's user avatar
  • 4,898