Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with axiom-of-choice
Search options not deleted
user 8628
An important and fundamental axiom in set theory sometimes called Zermelo's axiom of choice. It was formulated by Zermelo in 1904 and states that, given any set of mutually disjoint nonempty sets, there exists at least one set that contains exactly one element in common with each of the nonempty sets. The axiom of choice is related to the first of Hilbert's problems.
5
votes
1
answer
166
views
The equivalence of Dedekind-infinite and dually Dedekind-infinite as a weak form of (AC)
A set $X$ is Dedekind-infinite if there is an injective map $f: X\to X$ that is not surjective.
A set $X$ is dually Dedekind-infinite if there is a surjective map $f: X\to X$ that is not injective.
In …
- 48.9k
4
votes
Accepted
Proof of the axiom of choice for finite sets in ZF
It holds vacuously for $A = \emptyset$: then $\bigcup A = \emptyset$ and the empty function $\emptyset: \emptyset \to \emptyset$ trivially fulfills $f(a) \in A$ for all $a\in A$ -- because it is impos …
- 48.9k
3
votes
1
answer
266
views
A possible ${\sf (ZF)}$-theorem in the spirit of the $3$-set-lemma
The number $3$ plays an interesting role in the following statement:
$\newcommand{\S}{\sf(S_3)}\S$ Let $X$ be a non-empty set and let $f:X \to X$ be fixpoint-free (that is $f(x) \neq x$ for all $x\in …
- 48.9k
4
votes
1
answer
207
views
Weak Power Hypothesis and Dependent Choice
Consider in $\newcommand{\ZF}{{\sf (ZF)}}\ZF$ the following statement:
Weak Power Hypothesis (WPH): if $X,Y$ are sets and there is a bijection between $\newcommand{\P}{{\cal P}}\P(X)$ and $\P(Y)$, th …
- 48.9k
13
votes
1
answer
932
views
Cantor-Bernstein with "weakly injective" functions
Let us call a map $f: X \to Y$ between non-empty sets a "weak injection" if $f^{-1}(\{y\})\subseteq X$ is finite for every $y \in Y$.
Recall that the (Schroeder-)Cantor-Bernstein-Theorem (sometimes ab …
- 48.9k
6
votes
1
answer
279
views
The Parity Principle and $\mathbf{C}_2$ (choice for $2$-sets)
The Parity Principle states that
if $X\neq \emptyset$ is a set, then there is $\mathcal B\subseteq \mathcal P(X)$ such that whenever $a,b\in \mathcal P(X)$ with $a\mathbin\Delta b = \{x\}$ for some $ …
- 48.9k
15
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Parity and the Axiom of Choice
Motivation. The three-dimensional cube can be formalized by $\mathcal P(\{0,1,2\})$ where vertices $x,y\in\mathcal P(\{0,1,2\})$ are connected by an edge if and only if their symmetric difference $x\m …
- 48.9k
4
votes
0
answers
147
views
The monochromatic principle and the axiom of choice
For any set $A\neq\emptyset$, denote by $[A]^A$ the collection of sets $B\subseteq A$ such that there is a bijection $\varphi:B\to A$. If ${\cal S}\subseteq [A]^A$, we say that $B\in[A]^A$ is monochro …
- 48.9k
3
votes
2
answers
205
views
Posets such that the collection of principal down-sets does not have property ${\bf B}$
We say that a hypergraph $H=(V,E)$ has property ${\bf B}$ if there is $S\subseteq V$ such that for all $e\in E$ with $|e|>1$ we have $S\cap e \neq \emptyset \neq e \setminus S$.
Let $(P,\leq)$ be a pa …
- 48.9k
9
votes
1
answer
244
views
Non-Ramsey functions $c:[\omega]^\omega\to\{0,1\}$ and the Axiom of Choice
Let $[\omega]^\omega$ denote the collection of infinite subsets of $\omega$, and let $c:[\omega]^\omega\to\{0,1\}$ be a function. We say that $a\in [\omega]^\omega$ is monochromatic with respect to $c …
- 48.9k
7
votes
0
answers
196
views
Does the Weak Power Hypothesis imply the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem?
If there is a bijection $\varphi:x\to y$ between two sets $x$ and $y$, we use the notation $x\simeq y$. The Weak Power Hypothesis is the following statement:
(WPH) For all sets $x, y$, whenever ${\ca …
- 48.9k
3
votes
0
answers
207
views
Weak Power Hypothesis with injections instead of bijections
Let $x,y$ be sets. We use the following notation:
$x\simeq y$ means that there is a bijection $\varphi:x\to y$, and
$x\leq y$ means that there is an injection $\iota:x\to y$.
The Weak Power Hypothes …
- 48.9k
3
votes
1
answer
478
views
Does the partition principle imply (DC)?
For sets $x, y$ we write $x\leq y$, if there is an injection $\iota: x \to y$, and we write $x \leq^* y$ if either $x = \emptyset$ or there is a surjection $s: y \to x$. In ${\sf (ZF)}$ we have that $ …
- 48.9k
9
votes
1
answer
506
views
Does "$X \not\to (\omega)^\omega_2$ for every infinite $X$" imply ${\sf AC}$?
For any set $X$ and cardinal $\mu \neq \emptyset$, we denote by $[X]^\mu$ the collection of subsets of cardinality $\mu$. If $\kappa, \mu \neq \emptyset$ are cardinals and $f: [X]^\mu\to \kappa$ is a …
- 48.9k
3
votes
1
answer
181
views
Injections without fixed-points and the Axiom of Choice
Consider the following statement in $\sf ZF$:
(I) Whenever $X$ is a set with more than $1$ element, there is an injective map $\iota: X\to X$ such that $\iota(x) \neq x$ for all $x\in X$.
The Axiom …
- 48.9k