Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with career
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 7460
For questions about careers and jobs in mathematics (inside and outside academia)
12
votes
Can learning Riemann surfaces be more beneficial than numerical analysis for an analyst?
Let me answer the question in the title. The answer is definitely yes.
Just to mention an important topic, the proof of Uniformization Theorem for Riemann surfaces requires to construct at least one …
- 66.3k