Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Questions on group theory which concern finite groups.
14
votes
Accepted
Can $\text{Aut}(G)$ be extended to contain $G$?
Jesper Grodal and I once looked at this, cf. this answer. In particular Eilenberg and MacLane constructs a universal obstruction in $H^3(\text{Out}(G);Z(G))$ for the extension $1\rightarrow G\rightarr …
5
votes
Accepted
Group homology for a metacyclic group
The name metacyclic is normally used for a group which is cyclic-by-cyclic (ie. a group $G$ with a cyclic normal subgroup $N$ such that $G/N$ is also cyclic). I will therefore refer to a finite group …
4
votes
Cohomology of the adjoint representation of $\mathrm{SL}_2(k)$
(Too long for a comment.) A Magma computation shows that for $k=\mathbf{F}_p$ with $p$ prime the group $H^1(\operatorname{PSL}_2(k);k^3)$ equals $0$ for $p=3$ and $7\le p\le 17$ while the cohomology g …
6
votes
Accepted
Non-vanishing of the Tate-Shafarevich kernel in group cohomology
I think the following is an example of $Ш(G,M(G,H,\Bbb{F}_2))\neq 0$: Take $G=A_4$ and $H$ of order $2$. Then $M$ has dimension $5$ and a (computer) calculation shows that $Ш(G,M(G,H,\Bbb{F}_2))$ has …
16
votes
General bound for the number of subgroups of a finite group
A theorem of Borovik, Pyber and Shalev (Corollary 1.6) shows that the number of subgroups of a group $G$ of order $n=\lvert G\rvert$ is bounded by $n^{(\frac{1}{4}+o(1)) \log_2(n)}$. This is essential …
4
votes
Uniform proof that a finite (irreducible real) reflection group is determined by its degrees?
I dont know a proof (other than by inspecting the list of degrees) in the irreducible case. However in the reducible case, a finite real reflection group is not determined up to isomorphism by its deg …