Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with mp.mathematical-physics
Search options not deleted
user 62601
Mathematical methods in classical mechanics, classical and quantum field theory, quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, condensed matter, nuclear and atomic physics.
3
votes
1
answer
145
views
Does the Leclerc-Thibon involution exchange vertex operators of the first and second type?
This question is about $U_q ( \hat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2 )$ representation theory. There is a notion of vertex operators $\Phi_{\pm }(z)$ of first and $\Psi_{\pm}(z)$ of the second type. They are defined …
- 385
1
vote
Accepted
Does the Leclerc-Thibon involution exchange vertex operators of the first and second type?
I found the answer to the first question. Second and third questions remain.
\begin{align}
\Phi_+ (z) \rightarrow K^{-1/2} \Psi_+ (q^{-1} z) \\
\Phi_- (z) \rightarrow K^{1/2} \Psi_- (q^{-1} z)
\end{a …
- 385