Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with real-analysis
Search options not deleted
user 517040
Real-valued functions of real variable, analytic properties of functions and sequences, limits, continuity, smoothness of these.
11
votes
Extracting a common convergent indexing from an uncountable family of sequences
Using notation by the answer by Hamkins, I'll prove that $\mathbb c_{\mathbb R}\ge\min\{\mathfrak s,\mathfrak b\}$.
Thanks to Theorem 8.11 of Halbeisen's book Combinatorial Set Theory, we know that $\ …
- 300
9
votes
Extracting a common convergent indexing from an uncountable family of sequences
We prove that $\mathbb c=\mathbb c_{\mathbb R}$: clearly $\mathbb c\le\mathbb c_{\mathbb R}$ holds, hence it is enough to prove $\mathbb c\ge\mathbb c_{\mathbb R}$. This means: for all reflexive separ …
- 300