Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with derived-categories
Search options not deleted
user 46690
For questions about the derived categories of various abelian categories and questions regarding the derived category construction itself.
12
votes
Accepted
Are $D^b_{coh}(X)$ and $D^b(Coh(X))$ derived equivalent?
For X noetherian this is still true. (Proposition 3.5 in Daniel Huybrechts' book)
- 1,280
6
votes
Derived category of a hypersurface
Maybe it's worth spelling out the easy case of projective space (and Veronese embedding).
Take the standard exceptional collection $<O,O(1),...,O(n)>.$
The derived category of a hypersurface X of deg …
- 1,280
4
votes
Accepted
Morphism between Fourier-Mukai functors implies the morphism between kernels?
This is somewhat sad, but I think (part of) what we've learned from the whole triangulated-vs-dg story is the following pseudo-statement: the bare category of functors Fun(D(X),D(Y)) is the wrong thin …
- 1,280
3
votes
1
answer
378
views
Reference for comparison of heart cohomology with standard cohomology
I'm looking for a reference for the following fact (which I believe to be true and should be easy for people who understand how spectral sequences arise from filtrations).
Let A,B be two hearts of …
- 1,280
2
votes
0
answers
566
views
higher direct images of O(E)
I hope this is well known, I just could not work it out myself.
Say I have a variety X (smooth and projective over C is my usual setup) with a smooth subvariety Z. Let f: BL_Z(X) --> X be the blowup …
- 1,280
1
vote
0
answers
165
views
Ext and cup products and subvarieties
I am trying to understand Remark 11.3 in Huybrechts's amazing book on derived categories (FM transforms in AG).
He starts with smooth projective varieties $j\colon Y \subset X$ and aims to describe t …
- 1,280
0
votes
Equivariant derived category and invariant divisor
It would be nice to have that general statement, which looks very similar to the blowup formula.
I don't know if it holds. For curves (essentially over C) this was studied here http://arxiv.org/pdf/m …
- 1,280