Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with sites
Search options not deleted
user 4613
For questions related to the mathematical notion of site, which among others generalizes the notion of topological space. For questions on internet-sites, use online-resources, but note that these questions need to be very specific to research-level mathematics to be on-topic.
19
votes
1
answer
876
views
Has this "backwards" perspective on toposes been studied?
\begin{array}{|c|c|}
\hline
\text{locales}&\text{Grothendieck toposes}\\\hline
\text{open sets}&\text{sheaves}\\\hline
\text{continuous maps}&\text{geometric morphisms}\\\hline
\text{bases}&\text{sites … {morphisms of sites}\\\hline
\end{array}
Has this point of view been studied anywhere? …
- 66.8k