Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with fields
Search options not deleted
user 43263
Fields as algebraic objects. For vector and tensor fields, use eg. [dg.differential-geometry]. For physical fields, use eg. [mp.mathematical-physics] or [quantum-field-theory].
9
votes
2
answers
618
views
What is the state-of-the-art for solving polynomials systems over fields that are not algebr...
More specifically, what is the state-of-the-art when it comes to solving (whatever "solving" means in this case) system of polynomials of fields that are not algebraically closed, whose ideal has dimension …
- 697
2
votes
1
answer
185
views
Existence of solutions of polynomials systems (and their "rough" shape) over $\mathbb{R}$ & ...
There I asked about state-of-the-art methods to solve multivariate polynomials systems over non-algebraically closed fields in general. … But this doesn't work unfortunately for non-algebraically closed fields. …
- 697