Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 4262

The study of algebraic structures and properties applying to large classes of such structures. For example, ideas from group theory and ring theory are extended and considered for structures with other signatures (systems of basic or fundamental operations).

2 votes

Is there a notion of congruence relation for essentially algebraic structures?

There is an internal definition of congruence (q.v.) that works for any category. The categories of (Set-)models of finite limit sketches are exactly the locally finitely presentable categories, whic …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
4 votes

Computing colimits in a Lawvere theory

Prod(L, Set) is equivalent to the category of algebras for a finitary monad on Set and so is complete and cocomplete by e.g. Borceux Vol. 2 prop. 4.3.6.
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
8 votes
Accepted

Monad arising from operad

The answer is no, and it is explained in Appendix C of Leinster's book Higher Operads, Higher Categories. Briefly, a 'plain operad', for Leinster, is a non-symmetric operad in Set; a T-operad for T t …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622
7 votes

Relation between monads, operads and algebraic theories

Apart from Todd's recommendations, which I'd second, for monads and Lawvere theories there is Nishizawa and Power, Lawvere theories enriched over a general base, JPAA 213, 2009, and the references the …
Finn Lawler's user avatar
  • 3,622