Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Commutative rings, modules, ideals, homological algebra, computational aspects, invariant theory, connections to algebraic geometry and combinatorics.
29
votes
Accepted
Standard reduction to the artinian local case?
Dear Workitout: The list of comments above is getting unwieldy, so let me post an answer here, now that you have finally identified 1.10.1 in Katz-Mazur as (at least one) source of the question. As I …
4
votes
Accepted
Is weak normality stable under completion?
Here is a partial solution: modulo a problem of constructing "sufficiently generic" elements in the maximal ideal of a reduced noetherian local ring of dimension > 1 (in a sense made precise at the en …
36
votes
Accepted
Flatness and local freeness
By request, my earlier comments are being upgraded to an answer, as follows. For finitely generated modules over any local ring $A$, flat implies free (i.e., Theorem 7.10 of Matsumura's CRT book is co …
8
votes
Is the category of affine schemes (over a fixed field) Cartesian closed?
Set $A = B = k[x]$ and figure out for yourself what that is a counterexample. (Hint: rigorously prove that there's no "universal polynomial" over $k$-algebras.)
7
votes
Accepted
How to prove these two rings are not isomorphic
Does your critic dislike that the argument seems not applicable over general rings? But it is: if there's an isomorphism over some ring $R$ then we can descend to a finitely generated subring and pas …
21
votes
Accepted
Extra principal Cartier divisors on non-Noetherian rings? (answered: no!)
In the setup in the question, it should really say "we could have invertible meromorphic functions on Spec($A$) that don't come Frac($A)^{\times}$", since those are what give rise to "extra principal …
10
votes
Does a locally free sheaf over a product pushforward to a locally free sheaf?
The answer is "yes" (though I can't imagine a situation where one would really need this fact). More generally, if $A$ and $B$ are arbitrary commutative algebras over a field $k$ with $A$ noetherian …
17
votes
Accepted
Complete intersections and flat families
EGA IV$_4$, 19.3.8 (and 19.3.6); this addresses openness upstairs without properness, and (as an immediate consequence) the openness downstairs if $f$ is proper (which I assume you meant to require).
…
61
votes
Does "finitely presented" mean "always finitely presented"? (Answered: Yes!)
There's a famous quote, I think due to Szego, that a technique which can be used once is a trick, but if you can use it twice then it is a method. In that spirit, here is the EGA method which is very …
31
votes
Is projectiveness a Zariski-local property of modules? (Answered: Yes!)
A point worth noting: the proof of fpqc descent for projectivity in Raynaud-Gruson is apparently incorrect (as I learned today from Gabber in connection with something else), but the result is noneth …
23
votes
Accepted
To prove the Nullstellensatz, how can the general case of an arbitrary algebraically closed ...
These logic/ZFC/model theory arguments seem out of proportion to the task at hand. Let $k$ be a field and $A$ a finitely generated $k$-algebra over a field $k$. We want to prove that there is a $k$-a …
41
votes
Accepted
Does formally etale imply flat for noetherian schemes?
Every formally smooth morphism between locally noetherian schemes is flat; this is a deep result of Grothendieck. Indeed, the formal smoothness is preserved by localization on target and then likewis …