Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with analytic-number-theory
Search options not deleted
user 30800
On the blending of real/complex analysis with number theory. The study involves distribution of prime numbers and other problems and helps giving asymptotic estimates to these.
2
votes
Reference for Kronecker-Weyl theorem in full generality
Maybe my answer is beside the point, because the question speaks about the "limit distribution of $t(\theta_1,\dots,\theta_d)$" (for real $t$?). Shouldn't it be
$n(\theta_1,\dots,\theta_d)$ for $n=1,2 …
- 1,083
2
votes
Reference for Kronecker-Weyl theorem in full generality
Let me try to reinstate honor to the solution that proposed the basis change, by reducing the general case to the independent ("generic") case via a basis change, as opposed to proving it from scratch …
- 1,083