Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with convex-optimization
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 297
Optimization with convex constraints and convex objectives; notions related to convex optimization such as sub-gradients, normal cones, separating hyperplanes
21
votes
Is There an Induction-Free Proof of the 'Be The Leader' Lemma?
Is the following any clearer? (Read the subscripts carefully!)
$$\begin{array}{ll}
f_1(y_1) + f_2(y_2) + f_3(y_3) + \cdots + f_n(y_n) &\leq \\
f_1(y_2) + f_2(y_2) + f_3(y_3) + \cdots + f_n(y_n) & …
- 156k