Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
For questions on modules over rings.
3
votes
0
answers
318
views
a generalization of the annihilator of cokernel ideal (some new invariants of modules?) [closed]
Let $R$ be a (commutative, associative, unital) ring, consider a homomorphism of some (finitely generated) free $R$-modules $E\stackrel{A}{\rightarrow}F$. Say $rank(F)=m$. … These seem to be some very natural (and simple) invariants of modules.
Probably well known? References?
ps. Shame on me, these are precisely the invariants described in Eisenbud's Comm.Alg. …
0
votes
0
answers
165
views
on the ``generic" modules of finite length (skyscrapers)
More precisely, consider the modules of finite length, with presentation matrix of size $m\times n$, i.e. the minimal resolution begins as: $\cdots\rightarrow R^n\rightarrow R^m$. … What is known about the "non-generic" modules? (Some stratification by the ``degeneracy type"?) …
2
votes
0
answers
134
views
some sort of 'saturation' of module quotients
$R=k[[x_1,\dots,x_{p>1}]]$) Given two $R$-modules, $N\subset M$, of the same (finite, non-zero) rank. Their quotient, $M/N$, is torsion. I guess not much can be said in general. …
2
votes
1
answer
191
views
what are the possible approximations for ideals
Of course, the same question holds for modules, but then it's more difficult …
1
vote
1
answer
602
views
When fitting ideals determine the module?
(at least, for regular local rings, for Gorenstein rings of low dimensions, for Cohen-Macaulay modules...)
Any strengthening of such "fitting type" invariants that determines the module?
upd. … Then $coker(A)$ and $coker(A^T)$ have the same fitting ideals, though the modules are non-isomorphic in general …