Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with trace-formula
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 2720
Theoretical issues and applications of the Selberg, Arthur and relative trace formulas
3
votes
Reduction to Lie algebra version of fundamental lemma?
You can find it in Waldspurger's paper titled Le lemme fondamental implique le transfert.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000103112268
- 899
1
vote
Accepted
Small questions in studying Arthur 's book 'Introduction to the Trace formula'
I will try to answer both your questions in the context of Arthur's notes.
There does not exist a canonical action of a general connected reductive group $G$ on $N_P$ where $P = N_P M_P$ is a parabo …
- 899