Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Forcing is a method first used to prove the continuum hypothesis is independent of the classical axioms of set theory
8
votes
1
answer
333
views
Consistency Strength of "HC is elementary in V[G]"
Let $P$ be the Levy-collapse of the ordinals, so $P$ is a class forcing notion that makes every ordinal countable. …
6
votes
1
answer
387
views
Consistency of Weak Diamond with a Weak Version of Martin's Axiom
For all I know, both of these forcing extensions witness the consistency of $\Phi^* \land MA^*$. …
5
votes
Accepted
When are generic models not too wild?
For an example of a super-stable theory failing the property, you can take infinitely many unary predicates (so $Th(2^\omega, U_n: n \in \omega)$ where $U_n(\eta)$ holds iff $\eta(n) = 1$). Then if $\ …
3
votes
Accepted
Consistency of Weak Diamond with a Weak Version of Martin's Axiom
So I was looking through related questions on this site and the book "Proper and Improper Forcing" by Shelah kept popping up. So I checked it out and the appendix actually resolves the question. … This proof is gleaned from the proof of Theorem 2.11 in the Appendix of Shelah's "Proper and Improper forcing." …
2
votes
Problem understanding a passage of the proof of $\mathfrak{p}=\mathfrak{t}$ involving forcing
Incidentally, the forcing extension is superficial. At the beginning of the proof we can suppose by passing to a Levy collapse that $\mathfrak{t} = 2^{\aleph_0}$. …