Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with notation
Search options not deleted
user 238
For questions about mathematical notation, i.e. the symbols used to represent mathematical objects and operations.
1
vote
0
answers
3k
views
Notation for space of Lipschitz continuous functions
.$$ Is there a standard notation for the space of functions whose Lipschitz norm is finite? … $$X^1(D) = \{f \in C^1(D) : \|\nabla f\|_{\mathrm{Lip}} < \infty \}$$ I am using $X$ and $X^1$ here only as placeholders, and would prefer a better notation. …
- 8,532
3
votes
4
answers
511
views
Better terminology than "equivalence class of functions"
The notation $[f]_D$ is short and sweet, but the terminology "equivalence class of functions" is too clunky.
Question: Is there a better name for the object $[f]_D$? …
- 8,532