Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with hausdorff-measure
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 21051
Questions about Hausdorff measures, their variants (such as spherical Hausdorff measures) and generalisations.
4
votes
Accepted
Extending a $C^1$ function on $\mathbb R^n$ to a set of finite $\mathcal H^{n-2}$ measure
The claim holds under the much weaker assumption that the exceptional set satisfies $\mathcal H^{n-1}(E)=0$.
Since the limits of $f$ and $\nabla f$ exist everywhere we get two continuous functions $F\ …
- 16.4k