Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
11
votes
Accepted
Blowups of Cohen-Macaulay varieties
An example was given in Section 3 of this paper by Cutkosky: "A new characterization of rational surface singularities." (The scheme $Z$ in the last page, which is a blow up of some $m$-primary ideal …
10
votes
When is the reduced subscheme of a Cohen-Macaulay scheme also Cohen-Macaulay?
Very interesting question! I do not have a full answer, but here are a few cases when one can say something not completely trivial. I will assume as in your last paragraph that $X = {\rm Spec (S/(f))} …
9
votes
Accepted
Depth under localization over a Cohen-Macaulay ring
Here is a counter-example when $A$ is regular local of dimension $4$ and $n=3$, the first non-trivial case. Let $A = k[[x,y,z,t]]$, and $P$ be a prime ideal of height $3$, say $P=(x,y,z)$. Let $M=\Ome …
8
votes
Accepted
Equivalence of definitions of Cohen-Macaulay type
For the equivalence you need two more assumptions: (a) $M$ to have finite projective dimension and (b) $R$ to be Gorenstein. (a) is implicitly required in the second condition, otherwise you don't hav …
7
votes
Accepted
For every prime ideal $P$ of any Cohen-Macaulay ring $R$, is the sequence $\operatorname{dep...
Yes, for any ideal in a Noetherian local ring. See: this paper.
6
votes
Accepted
Irreducible components of quotients of Cohen-Macaulay rings of the "correct" dimension
Hi Alex, I think this fails for $n=2$. Start with a polynomial ring $S$ and height $2$ prime $P$ such that $S/P$ is not Cohen-Macaulay (for example let $P$ be the kernel of the map $S=k[a,b,c,d] \to …
6
votes
Accepted
CM for primary ideal
A useful way to think about this issue is to consider $J=I^{(n)}$, the $n$-symbolic power of $I$, which by definition is the $I$-primary component of $I^n$.
When $R$ is a polynomial rings over $\mat …
5
votes
Accepted
For isolated singularity algebra, is every maximal Cohen-Macaulay module locally projective?
The answer is no. Because locally, you can have a module over $\Lambda$ which is mCM over $R$ but not free. There are examples of singular $R$ with a module $M$ such that $\Lambda= End_R(M)$ has finit …
5
votes
Accepted
CM module is height-unmixed?
This is true if $A$ is local but fails in general.
First, a counterexample. Let $A=\mathbb Z[X]$ and $M= A/p\oplus A/q$ with $p=(2)$, $q=(3,X)$. Since any maximal ideal $m$ of $A$ can not contain bo …
5
votes
Accepted
Ideals in Artinian Gorenstein local ring $(R,\mathfrak m)$ with $\mu(\mathfrak m)=2, \mathfr...
We use the fact that in an Artinian Gorenstein ring, any ideal contains the socle. The assumption tells us that the socle of $A$ is $\mathfrak m^2$, which is principal.
Let $I\neq (0)$ be a non-maxima …
4
votes
Accepted
Multiplicity of $Ext^{d-t}(M,\omega_R)$, ($d=\dim R, t=\dim M$)
It is equal to the multiplicity of $M$. In fact, you do not need graded or even Cohen-Macaulayness of $M$. Let $N= \textrm{Ext}^{d-t}(M,\omega_R)$. Let $S(M) := \{P \in \textrm{Supp}(M), \dim R/P = t\ …
4
votes
Are schematic fixed-points of a Cohen-Macaulay scheme Cohen-Macaulay?
Edit: the following does not answer Ben's question. It gives an example of the subring fixed by $G_m$ being not CM, while the question asked about the subscheme of fixed points, see the comments for m …
3
votes
Accepted
Class group of hypersurfaces of finite representation type
When $d\geq 3$, these are isolated hypersurface singularities of dimension at least $4$, so are UFD by the Grothendieck's local Lefschetz Theorem.
When $d=2$ and the field has characteristic $0$, the …
2
votes
Why is $M$ torsion-free?
The authors reduce to the case of $R$ complete with infinite residue field and use them implicitly at a couple of places in the proof. This is a fairly standard practice. For instance, to assert that …