Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with lattices
Search options not deleted
user 16537
Lattices in the sense of discrete subgroups of Euclidean spaces, as used in number theory, discrete geometry, Lie groups, etc. (Not to be confused with lattice theory or lattices as used in physics! For lattices (ordered sets), use the tag: [lattice-theory])
12
votes
2
answers
976
views
Higman's lemma and a manuscript of Erdős and Rado
Motivated by a problem in factorization theory, I've recently proved the following:
Theorem. If $X$ is a non-empty finite alphabet and $\mathcal W$ an infinite subset of the free semigroup, $X^\as …
- 2,339
13
votes
Accepted
Polynomials leaving invariant the Gaussian integers
Your question is related to the study of (generalized) numerical polynomials: If $R$ is an integral domain and $K$ the field of fractions of $R$, then the set ${\rm Int}(R) := \{f \in K[x]: f(R) \subs …
- 10.5k