Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with analytic-number-theory
Search options not deleted
user 153423
On the blending of real/complex analysis with number theory. The study involves distribution of prime numbers and other problems and helps giving asymptotic estimates to these.
2
votes
1
answer
398
views
On the proof of Theorem 15.2 in Montgomery-Vaughan's Multiplicative number theory
I am trying to understand the proof of Theorem 15.2 in the aforementioned book. In this proof, the authors seem to infer that, if $\psi(x) - x < x^{\Theta - \epsilon}$ for every $\epsilon > 0$ and su …
- 23