Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with semi-riemannian-geometry
Search options not deleted
user 135778
Manifolds with a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form in each tangent space varying differentiably but with constant index and signature.
2
votes
1
answer
309
views
$(M,g)$ is complete iff $(\tilde{M},\tilde{g})$ is complete (non-Riemannian version)
I'm not sure if this question is too low level for Math Overflow (so feel free to move this to SE if you think it is).
Inspired by this and this question I'm wondering if the following statement is a …
- 26.3k