Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with differential-operators
Search options not deleted
user 1306
Elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic operators. Laplace, Laplace-Beltrami, Schrödinger, Dirac. Exterior derivative and Lie derivative operators.
2
votes
Accepted
Hochschild (co)homology of differential operators
It is not literally what you want, but very close: check Proposition 2.3 and related results in "A Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch formula for traces of differential operators" by Markus Engeli and Giovanni F …
- 16.9k
18
votes
Accepted
Are there any natural differential operators besides $d$?
I think your question, the way it is stated, makes one want to classify unary and binary (depending how far you generalise the question as written) invariant differential operators on tensor fields. T …
- 16.9k
1
vote
Modules over rings of differential operators
If $A$ is an algebra, $M$ is a left $A$-module, and $B$ is an $A$-bimodule (e.g. $A$ itself, like in your example), then $Hom_A(M,B)$ is a right $A$-module, with the action given, as you suggest, by $ …
- 16.9k