Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Prime numbers, diophantine equations, diophantine approximations, analytic or algebraic number theory, arithmetic geometry, Galois theory, transcendental number theory, continued fractions
5
votes
Accepted
Which unimodular lattices $L\subset \mathbb R^2$ minimize $f_t(L):=\sum_{ v\in L} e^{-t \|v\...
The answer is that $f_t(A)$ is uniquely minimized at the hexagonal lattice (up to rotation).
The comment by Marco Golla led me to the following paper by Laurent Bétermin which proves the result in a m …
9
votes
1
answer
203
views
Which unimodular lattices $L\subset \mathbb R^2$ minimize $f_t(L):=\sum_{ v\in L} e^{-t \|v\...
$\DeclareMathOperator\SL{SL}\DeclareMathOperator\SO{SO}$Consider the lattices in $\SL(2,\mathbb R)(\mathbb Z^2)$ up to rotation. The space of such lattices can be identified with the modular surface $ …