Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with zeta-functions
Search options not deleted
user 11856
Zeta functions are typically analogues or generalizations of the Riemann zeta function. Examples include Dedekind zeta functions of number fields, and zeta functions of varieties over finite fields. They are typically initially defined as formal generating functions, but often admit analytic continuations.
33
votes
1
answer
1k
views
What does this connection between Chebyshev, Ramanujan, Ihara and Riemann mean?
It all started with Chris' answer saying returning paths on cubic graphs without backtracking can be expressed by the following recursion relation:
$$p_{r+1}(a) = ap_r(a)-2p_{r-1}(a)$$
$a$ is an …
- 457
3
votes
0
answers
461
views
How does the topology of the graphs' Riemann surface relate to its knot representation?
Let's consider the following bipartite cubic planar non-simple graph
$\hskip2.3in$
Looking at the orientation of the edges around the vertices, it is obvious that left and right are oriented opposite. …
- 457