Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with weights
Search options not deleted
user 11640
4
votes
Accepted
Functoriality of weighted limits
Let $X$ be an arbitrary object in $\mathcal{C}$.
I write $\{ W, F \}$ for the limit of $F$ weighted by $W$.
By definition,
$$\mathcal{C} (X, \{ W, F \}) \cong [\mathcal{I}, \textbf{Set}] (W, \mathcal{ …
- 15.9k
12
votes
Accepted
What's the intuition for weighted limits?
In enriched category theory, weighted limits may be strictly more general than conical limits, in the sense that an enriched category with all conical limits may fail to have all weighted limits.
Howe …
- 15.9k