Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
For questions about simplicial sets, simplicial (co)algebras and simplicial objects in other categories; geometric realization, Dold-Kan correspondence, simplicial resolutions etc.
2
votes
Accepted
Cartesian products between cofibrant simplicial presheaves
If $\mathcal{C}$ has finite products, then the class of projective cofibrations is also closed under finite products. Indeed, since the cartesian product in the category of simplicial presheaves prese …
1
vote
Accepted
Canonical colimit and cartesian product of simplicial sets
You can do this for any category of presheaves. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a small category. For a presheaf $X$ on $\mathcal{C}$, we write $\mathbf{El} (X)$ for the category of elements of $X$, i.e. the com …
4
votes
Accepted
Equivalent definition of a Kan fibration
The class of morphisms having the right lifting property with respect to $\Lambda^1_k \times \Delta^n \hookrightarrow \Delta^1 \times \Delta^n$ (for all $k \in \{ 0, 1 \}$ and all $n \ge 0$) is strict …
2
votes
Does a topological hypercover always have free degeneracies?
Here is a proof for the case where $X$ is a Hausdorff space. Note that each $U_n$ is also Hausdorff in this case.
A standard argument shows that the face operators of $U_\bullet$ are (surjective) loc …
4
votes
Accepted
smash product of pointed spaces preserve weak equivalences
Yes, $\wedge$ is invariant under weak homotopy equivalence in $\mathbf{sSet}_*$. It suffices to show that it sends anodyne extensions (= trivial cofibrations) to weak homtoopy equivalences: indeed, ev …
5
votes
Does the nerve functor (resp. fundamental groupoid functor) preserve homotopy colimits (resp...
The nerve functor does not preserve homotopy colimits. Indeed, take any simplicial set $X$ with non-trivial $\pi_n$ ($n > 1$) and consider $X$ as a simplicial diagram of sets. In $\mathbf{sSet}$, its …
3
votes
Do simplicial objects in a Topos form a model category?
As pointed out, the answer is no – because we cannot hope to have fibrant replacements in general. On the other hand, by following the programme of van Osdol [1977, Simplicial homotopy in an exact cat …
9
votes
Accepted
Two definitions of modules in monoidal category
I will write $[B, C]$ instead of $\underline{\mathrm{Hom}}(B, C)$. Recall the tensor–hom adjunction:
$$\mathrm{Hom}(A \otimes B, C) \cong \mathrm{Hom}(A, [B, C])$$
Thus there is a canonical bijection …
1
vote
Group cohomology without G-modules (a.k.a. what does this bar construction compute?)
It is well known that the underlying simplicial set of a simplicial group is a Kan complex. However, the underlying simplicial set of the canonical simplicial resolution (call it $F_\bullet G$) you de …
6
votes
Contractibility of the category of cosimplicial resolutions
Since you have functorial factorisations you should exploit that to the hilt.
If $\mathcal{M}$ is a model category with functorial factorisations then the category $\mathbf{c}\mathcal{M}$ of cosimplic …
9
votes
0
answers
207
views
Is the category of all topological spaces, including the bad ones, simplicially tensored and...
Let $\textbf{Top}$ be the category of all topological spaces, including the bad ones.
We can make $\textbf{Top}$ into a simplicially enriched category as follows:
Given topological spaces $X$ and $Y$ …