Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 10605

The homotopy interpretation of constructive dependent type theory, the univalence axiom, higher inductive types, internal languages of higher toposes, univalent foundations for mathematics, and implementations of such theories in proof assistants.

12 votes
Accepted

Delooping in homotopy type theory

The definition you gave is not of an $A_\infty$-space, but just of $A_1$-space. As Charles noted, these two classes of spaces are very different in general. For example, there are also higher isomorph …
Anton Fetisov's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

How to proceed with a type-theoretic proof that $\Sigma \mathbb{S}^1 \simeq \mathbb{S}^2$?

I'm not sure if it is the most elegant way, but it is certainly the most direct. So, we need to define the image of $\mathrm {surf}$ as an element of $refl_{\mathrm N} = refl_{\mathrm N}$. We proceed …
Anton Fetisov's user avatar
3 votes

(Co)limits of locally cartesian closed categories

I was talking about the following tentative argument. The 2-category of distributors (also called profunctors) $\mathrm{Dist}$ has (small) categories for objects. For $C,D:\mathrm{Dist}$ the 2-categor …
Anton Fetisov's user avatar
1 vote

Homotopy type theory: Are the hierarchy of Type_k universes isomorphic?

The Univalence axiom states that homotopy equivalent types are equal. That doesn't mean the hierarchy is collapsible: that would require judgemental and not Leibniz equality. The very point of HoTT is …
Anton Fetisov's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Can Homotopy Type Theory or algebraic geometry deal with homotopy fibers in terms of families?

Yes, there is a certain sense in which your statements are true. As Mike Shulman and Qiaochu Yuan said, the strict fiber of a map cannot be defined in HoTT and doesn't make sense, but you can work fro …
Anton Fetisov's user avatar
4 votes

The groupoid of algebraic expressions and proofs

I don't have any direct reference for the notion that you are describing, however the notions of $E_n$-algebras and (topological) operads are very close. Firstly, you should note that you need equalit …
Anton Fetisov's user avatar