Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 10384

The general enterprise of calibrating the strength of classical mathematical theorems in terms of the axioms, typically of set existence, needed to prove them; originated in its modern form in the 1970s by H. Friedman and S. G. Simpson (see R.A. Shore, "Reverse Mathematics: The Playground of Logic", 2010).

14 votes

Are key theorems finitistically reducible?

There are various problems with finitistic reducibility as Simpson develops it; for a survey, see §5.3 of my Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on reverse mathematics. I tend to agree that the …
Benedict Eastaugh's user avatar
10 votes
3 answers
1k views

New research on coding in reverse mathematics?

Coding is obviously a fundamental tool in reverse mathematics, and practitioners take care to both demonstrate the correctness of their coding mechanisms and point out their limitations. Harvey Friedm …
Benedict Eastaugh's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
511 views

Fragments of Morse—Kelley set theory

Morse—Kelley set theory (hereafter MK) is the impredicative counterpart of von Neumann—Bernays—Gödel set theory (NBG), where formulas containing class quantifiers are permitted in the comprehension sc …
Benedict Eastaugh's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
231 views

Attribution of an equivalence of the existence of omega-models of RCA0

There are many well-known equivalences in reverse mathematics between statements of the form "Every set is contained a countable coded $\omega$-model of $T$" and $S$, where $S, T$ are subsystems of se …
Benedict Eastaugh's user avatar
5 votes

Equivalences between statements of (seemingly) different order

When we say "with set parameters" I take it that what we really mean is something of the form: the axioms of (e.g.) the $\Sigma^0_1$ induction scheme are the universal closures of all formulas of the …
Benedict Eastaugh's user avatar