Skip to main content
3 of 3
edited tags
Sam Nead
  • 28.2k
  • 5
  • 72
  • 133

Volume of the Weeks manifold and of the 5.2 knot complement

Some computations show that the Weeks manifold and the 5.2 knot complement have the same trace field (which is $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3-x+1)$) and the (hyperbolic) volume of the second is 3 times the volume of the first.

My question is: is there a geometric explanation?

They cannot be commensurable, as one is compact and the other isn't. I also have an algebraic explanation: the Bloch group of the trace field has rank 1, but I would prefer a geometric one, explaining the factor 3.